Grant Taylor via bind-users wrote:
> On 11/13/21 7:29 AM, Tony Finch wrote:
> > You should make sure that your public nameservers return a definite nodata
> > or NXDOMAIN reply for your private names, not REFUSED, nor a referral to an
> > RFC 1918 address. The latter two will cause resolvers to re
Am 13.11.21 um 17:20 schrieb Grant Taylor via bind-users:
On 11/13/21 9:07 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
* he needs the delegation because lack of control
Maybe I've lost context, but I thought the overall theme of the thread
was delegating to a private IP address
"Because I might not be able
On 11/13/21 9:07 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
but you have to deal with it
And? So?
We have to deal with all sorts of things. The need to do our job is not
a reason in and of itself a reason to not do it.
you missed my second post!
No, order of reply vs reading.
* he needs the delegation
On 11/13/21 7:29 AM, Tony Finch wrote:
You should make sure that your public nameservers return a definite
nodata or NXDOMAIN reply for your private names, not REFUSED, nor a
referral to an RFC 1918 address. The latter two will cause resolvers
to retry, and the retries can become a large propor
Am 13.11.21 um 17:00 schrieb Grant Taylor via bind-users:
On 11/13/21 12:59 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
i doubt that any ISP out there would delegate to a private address and
when your bind is asked over it's public IP a view won't work
ISP's willingness to do something is a policy decision and
On 11/13/21 12:59 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
i doubt that any ISP out there would delegate to a private address and
when your bind is asked over it's public IP a view won't work
ISP's willingness to do something is a policy decision and that's
completely different than their capability to do som
A couple of generaal points about private names and addresses:
If you have a private subdomain, e.g. private.cam.ac.uk, and a
non-negligible number of users, the names *will* leak into the outside
world and your public nameservers will get queries for them. You should
make sure that your public na
On 13/11/2021 07:16, Erich Eckner wrote:
On Sat, 13 Nov 2021, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 12.11.21 um 18:55 schrieb lejeczek via bind-users:
>> On 12/11/2021 17:14, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> wouldn't it be easier to setup two different
subdomains in which case you don't need delegation at all
> On 13. 11. 2021, at 8:16, Erich Eckner wrote:
>
> The problem arises, as soon as you have some clients *outside* of this
> local net (inside some other local net), which should also resolve the
> internal ips - this is, what I have, and why I use a public zone for my
> private addresses: Most h
Am 13.11.21 um 08:59 schrieb Reindl Harald:
Am 13.11.21 um 08:16 schrieb Erich Eckner:
On Sat, 13 Nov 2021, Reindl Harald wrote:
i mean when it's private and not www why does the world need to know
about the subdomain?
Because I might not be able to control nor have input into
local-priv
Am 13.11.21 um 08:16 schrieb Erich Eckner:
On Sat, 13 Nov 2021, Reindl Harald wrote:
i mean when it's private and not www why does the world need to know
about the subdomain?
Because I might not be able to control nor have input into
local-private bind(s) and thus...
clients/nodes on privat
11 matches
Mail list logo
