To confirm, this is a local caching also-known-as recursive resolver. It
is quick (< 100 msec) when answering from cache, but not when it has to do
lookups itself (> 1000 msec).
On Thu, 12 Mar 2020, ShubhamGoyal wrote:
we made a recurive resolver (Cent OS 7, 8GB RAM ,250 GB Hard disk and net
Are the response times the same in the local network, and in the server console
itself? Just to isolate if the problem is in the server side, or on the
network side which many has already suggested.
Jukka
Lähettäjä: bind-users Puolesta ShubhamGoyal
Lähetetty: 12. maaliskuuta 2020 7:24
Vastaan
On 12.03.20 11:54, ShubhamGoyal wrote:
we made a recurive resolver (Cent OS 7, 8GB RAM ,250 GB Hard disk and network
speed is also good ) . It reply in 1200 msec and 1800 msec (which is very
slow). if it gave Reply by Cache (80 msec or 76 msec).
so i want to know about,
How can i improve my rec
Hi there,
On Thu, 12 Mar 2020, ShubhamGoyal wrote:
we made a recurive resolver (Cent OS 7, 8GB RAM ,250 GB Hard disk and network
speed is also good ) . It reply in 1200 msec and 1800 msec (which is very
slow). if it gave Reply by Cache (80 msec or 76 msec).
so i want to know about,
How can i
4 matches
Mail list logo