On 03/05/2019 12:07 PM, Tony Finch wrote:
It's not clear to me where the zone cuts are, but I guess what you are
seeing is a referral when outside the allow-recursion ACL, so the server
thinks glue is required; and no additional data inside the allow-recursion
ACL because there's no referral when
Grant Taylor via bind-users wrote:
>
> My test query is returning the A record for an NS that is out of zone but in a
> different zone on the same server.
>
> something.aaa.example.net.NS ns1.bbb.example.net.
>
> dig is still showing ns1.bbb.example.net's A record in additional data when
On 03/05/2019 10:51 AM, Tony Finch wrote:
There's an old entry in the CHANGES file:
912. [bug] Attempts to set the 'additional-from-cache' or
'additional-from-auth' option to 'no' in a
server with recursion enabled will now
Grant Taylor via bind-users wrote:
>
> options {
> …
> additional-from-auth no;
> additional-from-cache no;
> allow-recursion { myACL; };
> // recursion no;
> …
> };
There's an old entry in the CHANGES file:
912. [bug] Attempts to set the 'additio
Hi,
I need some help understanding why the following doesn't work as desired.
I want to 1) allow recursion from subnets defined in myACL, 2) block
recursion from the rest of the world, and 3) not return any additional
data to anybody.
options {
…
additional-from-auth no;
On 05.03.19 14:41, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
This was a long time ago. In the meantime I have rebooted the server.
What I see, is that the resolving does not work from other locations.
Only when I use my own nameserver the domain is resolved, and it gives
an "Non-authoritative answer".
both ki
Op 05-03-19 om 15:21 schreef Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
>>> On 05/03/2019 01:01, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
Not sure. It was a domain used for testing purposes.
Before it was in /etc/bind/named.conf.local, but I removed it from
there.
>
>> Op 05-03-19 om 11:51 schreef Anand Buddhdev
On 05/03/2019 01:01, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
Not sure. It was a domain used for testing purposes.
Before it was in /etc/bind/named.conf.local, but I removed it from there.
Op 05-03-19 om 11:51 schreef Anand Buddhdev:
Did you run "rndc reconfig" after removing it from the named.conf.local
fi
Op 05-03-19 om 11:51 schreef Anand Buddhdev:
> On 05/03/2019 01:01, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
>
>> Not sure. It was a domain used for testing purposes.
>>
>> Before it was in /etc/bind/named.conf.local, but I removed it from there.
>
> Did you run "rndc reconfig" after removing it from the named.c
On 05/03/2019 01:01, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
> Not sure. It was a domain used for testing purposes.
>
> Before it was in /etc/bind/named.conf.local, but I removed it from there.
Did you run "rndc reconfig" after removing it from the named.conf.local
file?
Anand
10 matches
Mail list logo
