BIND 9.11.0b1, the first beta release of the BIND 9.11 branch, is now
available for download from the ISC website (at
http://www.isc.org/downloads)
BIND 9.11 brings many changes to BIND, including a new license
(the Mozilla Public License 2.0 -- you can read about it here:
https://www.isc.org/blog
In message
, rams writes:
>
> Hi,
> Greetings
> Is anyone can help me to verify the NSEC3 record in response is correct or
> not.
> Do we have any tool or command to check closet encloser NSEC3 record or
> Correct NSEC3 record returned in response.
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Ramesh
named :-)
Victoria Risk wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> > I don't think the MPL-2.0 has a "pay for an exception" clause, so this
> > would seem to imply that you plan to dual license BIND, or license BIND
> > under a modified license based on the MPL-2.0. Is that correct?
>
> You are correct. We expect that some o
Hi Robert,
> It looks like this was announced today:
>
> https://www.isc.org/blogs/bind9-adopts-the-mpl-2-0-license-with-bind-9-11-0/
>
>> The MPL license requires that anyone redistributing the code who has changed
>> it must publish their changes (or pay for an exception to the license). It
Alan Clegg wrote:
>
> As for NOTIMP, I'm not aware of an easy path, but I'm sure that someone here
> knows.
; <<>> DiG 9.11.0a1 <<>> +noedns dotat.at in maila
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOTIMP, id: 42331
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, A
SERVFAIL: create a delegation NS record in your zone to a server that
isn't authoritative for the zone being delegated.
REFUSED: create an ACL that matches (and denies) the query being done
NOERROR w/ no RR: query for example.com
As for NOTIMP, I'm not aware of an easy path, but I'm sur
Hi,
Greetings
Is anyone can help me to verify the NSEC3 record in response is correct or
not.
Do we have any tool or command to check closet encloser NSEC3 record or
Correct NSEC3 record returned in response.
Thanks & Regards,
Ramesh
___
Please visi
7 matches
Mail list logo
