-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Mon, 2016-04-25 at 23:23 +0300, Ali Jawad wrote:
> based on a user tool the users "hundreds in corporate environment" get
> either public or private zone,
Rather than the tool writing an ACL for bind, can the tool instead
reconfigure the user's l
On 25/04/16 22:23, Ali Jawad wrote:
Hi Ali Jawad,
> I do have a very specific requirement for private/public zones and based on
> a user tool the users "hundreds in corporate environment" get either public
> or private zone, the tool simply writes to an ACL file, my problem is that
> the only way
Hi
I do have a very specific requirement for private/public zones and based on
a user tool the users "hundreds in corporate environment" get either public
or private zone, the tool simply writes to an ACL file, my problem is that
the only way I found that does not flush the cache of the server and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Mon, 2016-04-25 at 13:54 -0400, Sean Son wrote:
> Reindl
> Thank you for your response. Let me see if what you provided will
> work
> with what I am trying to do.
If you are compiling any source code for rpm based distributions like
RedHat, you
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016, at 11:33 AM, Matthew Pounsett wrote:
> Unless you have a clear reason to do it (perhaps there's some security
> consideration I haven't thought of) it seems to me it's unnecessary
> complexity that would lead to problems just like this.
Noted.
Still, I'd honestly like to k
On Monday, 25 April 2016, wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016, at 10:58 AM, Matthew Pounsett wrote:
> > It's not clear to me why one would want to destroy/rebuild the chroot
> every
> > time you restart the process.
>
> Well, here
>
> (1) Because I inherited it this way, and
> (2) The notes' quoted
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016, at 10:58 AM, Matthew Pounsett wrote:
> It's not clear to me why one would want to destroy/rebuild the chroot every
> time you restart the process.
Well, here
(1) Because I inherited it this way, and
(2) The notes' quoted examples did that too, and
(3) I'd not yet gotten a
On 25 April 2016 at 13:53, wrote:
>
>
> I suspect that there's something wrong with what is/isn't copied , and
> maybe when, in that chroot build/destroy script.
>
It's not clear to me why one would want to destroy/rebuild the chroot every
time you restart the process. However, as long as you'r
Reindl
Thank you for your response. Let me see if what you provided will work
with what I am trying to do.
Thanks again!
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 1:36 PM, Reindl Harald
wrote:
>
>
> Am 25.04.2016 um 19:23 schrieb Sean Son:
>
>> Thank you for your reply.
>>
>> The issue is, I do not know wha
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016, at 10:46 AM, Matthew Pounsett wrote:
> > Unfortunately, that^ returns no TXT record either. Which to me suggests
> > the problem's 'earlier'.
> >
>
> Yeah. I think you need to solve the problem with the vanishing journal
> file first. But, the above dig is what you *sho
On 25 April 2016 at 13:44, wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016, at 10:19 AM, Matthew Pounsett wrote:
> > > TBH I don't understand WHAT to 'expect' from dig to test/verify this^.
> > > What do I dig to get an answer with "TEST STRING" in it?
> >
> > dig in txt test.example.com @ns01.example.com
>
>
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016, at 10:19 AM, Matthew Pounsett wrote:
> > TBH I don't understand WHAT to 'expect' from dig to test/verify this^.
> > What do I dig to get an answer with "TEST STRING" in it?
>
> dig in txt test.example.com @ns01.example.com
Thanks.
Unfortunately, that^ returns no TXT recor
Thank you for your reply.
The issue is, I do not know what other services/targets will need to be
started prior to BIND starting. In other words, I have no idea how to set
up the unit file for BIND.
Thanks
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 12:09 PM, Anand Buddhdev wrote:
> On 25/04/16 17:59, Sean Son
On Sunday, 24 April 2016, wrote:
> > This zone would not pass named-checkzone, which interestingly, is the
> same code which named itself uses when initially loading a zone.
>
> It appears to
>
> named-checkzone -t /var/chroot/named example.com
> /namedb/master/example.com.zone
>
On 25/04/16 17:59, Sean Son wrote:
Hi Sean Son,
> I know I emailed the list about compiling BIND on a SystemD distro earlier
> last month. This time I have a different question. After I compile BIND9 on
> CentOS 7 , how do I get it to start up at boot time and how do I restart
> it? I don't want
Hello all
I know I emailed the list about compiling BIND on a SystemD distro earlier
last month. This time I have a different question. After I compile BIND9 on
CentOS 7 , how do I get it to start up at boot time and how do I restart
it? I don't want to have to write a systemd unit configuration f
16 matches
Mail list logo
