> On 30 Jan 2016, at 21:57, John Levine wrote:
>
>> If chained CNAMEs work for you, more power to you. But don't be
>> surprised if they fail unexpectedly at some point.
>
> If they don't, you'll have a lot of unhappy users since there's a
> whole lot of the Internet they won't be able to see
In article ,
Grant Taylor wrote:
> I think chained CNAMEs fall into the gray area (no mans land) between
> zealots on either side of the RFC interpretation line.
>
> If chained CNAMEs work for you, more power to you. But don't be
> surprised if they fail unexpectedly at some point.
We shoul
2 matches
Mail list logo
