Mark,
Unfortunately, due to my company's policy, i cannot provide you the information.
Thank you for your help.
Te
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> Do you really want help? If so stop obscuring the details.
>
> Mark
>
> In message
> ,
> Teerapatr Kittiratanachai writes
Do you really want help? If so stop obscuring the details.
Mark
In message
, Teerapatr
Kittiratanachai writes:
> Hi List,
>
> I have faced the problem.
> Firstly, I have 2 nameserver, the first nameserver is the
> authoritative nameserver and not allow the recursive. The second one
> is the
Hi List,
I have faced the problem.
Firstly, I have 2 nameserver, the first nameserver is the
authoritative nameserver and not allow the recursive. The second one
is the recursive nameserver, and also store zonefile as the same with
the first server.
I have remove zonefile from the first server an
In article ,
Jeff Sadowski wrote:
> I have a number of slave domains that I would like a naming scheme and
> not have to go to each and change the filename.
>
> I have the following zones
>
> zone "1.168.192.in-addr.arpa" {
> include "named.slave";
> };
> zone "2.168.192.in-addr.arpa"
.ibm, .cisco, .apple, .google, .sucks, .melbourne and many hundreds of others
have been applied for and hundreds already delegated into the root. '.hp' was
deemed too short (must be at least 3 characters).
See https://gtldresult.icann.org/application-result/applicationstatus for the
new TLD's
-Original Message-
From: Reindl Harald
Organization: the lounge interactive design
Date: Wednesday, April 1, 2015 at 2:44 PM
To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org"
Subject: Re: com.google how did they do that
>Am 01.04.2015 um 20:42 schrieb Thomas Schulz:
>> As of the time I am sending this, yo
I have a number of slave domains that I would like a naming scheme and
not have to go to each and change the filename.
I have the following zones
zone "1.168.192.in-addr.arpa" {
include "named.slave";
};
zone "2.168.192.in-addr.arpa" {
include "named.slave";
};
zone "3.168.192.in-
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 8:25 AM, Barry Margolin wrote:
> In article ,
> /dev/rob0 wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 11:34:42AM -0700, Frank Even wrote:
>> > In this particular instance, the masters ended up under maintenance
>> > shortly after these boxes rebooted, so they were unable to trans
On 1 April 2015 at 20:53, Barry S. Finkel wrote:
> It would be a good idea to also have the other Active Directory
> "underscore" zones:
>
> __sites.
> _tcp.
> _udp.
>
> on your slave server.
>From what I've seen in the field, in most AD installations those
aren't actual subdomains
Remember to put check-names ignore to use underlined zones.
> On Apr 1, 2015, at 4:53 PM, Barry S. Finkel wrote:
>
> On 4/1/2015, Jeff Sadowski wrote
>> The other day I found that my secondary name servers running bind
>> where not dishing out
>>
>> _msdcs. SRV records
>>
>> This was causing
On 4/1/2015, Jeff Sadowski wrote
The other day I found that my secondary name servers running bind
where not dishing out
_msdcs. SRV records
This was causing join issues. It turned out that the Domain controller
had 2 different scopes one for
_msdcs.
and one for
so I shared the second _msdc
In article ,
Jan-Piet Mens wrote:
> > I'm sure it was not cheap.
>
> Peanuts compared to their buying .app for $25m. [1] Here's a list of the
> other TLDs they've got so far: [2]
Some of them sound like more April Fools jokes.
>
> > Brace yourself! There are many here now, and more coming.
Lightner, Jeff would like to recall the message, "subdomain with domain".
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential
information and is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you are
not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or u
You can do subdomains with the one zone file rather than having separate zones
you just have to put a new ORIGIN for the subdomain.
In the domain file for after the SOA and existing records (NS, A,
CNAME etc...) add a line:
$ORIGIN _msdcs..; New subdomain
Then add the records (A, CNAM
> I'm sure it was not cheap.
Peanuts compared to their buying .app for $25m. [1] Here's a list of the
other TLDs they've got so far: [2]
> Brace yourself! There are many here now, and more coming.
The list of delegated strings [3] increases almost daily, yes. (And I
can't stop laughing.)
On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 02:42:04PM -0400, Thomas Schulz wrote:
> As of the time I am sending this, you can point your browser
> to http://com.google and get a web page. How did they get
> com.google to resolve?
I'm sure it was not cheap.
Brace yourself! There are many here now, and more coming.
Am 01.04.2015 um 20:42 schrieb Thomas Schulz:
As of the time I am sending this, you can point your browser to
http://com.google and get a web page. How did they get com.google
to resolve?
.google is just another new TLD
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
As of the time I am sending this, you can point your browser to
http://com.google and get a web page. How did they get com.google
to resolve?
Tom Schulz
Applied Dynamics Intl.
sch...@adi.com
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-us
> zone "_msdcs." {
> [..]
> file "data/db.192.168.1.2.slave";
> };
> zone "" {
> [..]
> file "data/db.192.168.1.2.slave";
> };
Both zones are being backed by the same file, so one will be overwriting
the other. This may not be the cause of the half-working situation, but
it won't be helping. D
The other day I found that my secondary name servers running bind
where not dishing out
_msdcs. SRV records
This was causing join issues. It turned out that the Domain controller
had 2 different scopes one for
_msdcs.
and one for
so I shared the second _msdcs. scope with all my bind secondary
Chris Buxton wrote:
>
> The BIND name server will not read /etc/resolv.conf (which is what that
> dns-nameserver line refers to), so set it to '::1'. Or whatever makes
> sense to you.
However! Since you are configuring BIND to be an authoritative-only
server, you want the local resolver to point
21 matches
Mail list logo
