Re: howto have internal BIND resolve "host" (internal host name/no dots)?

In message <54eba9b8.2000...@tlinx.org>, "L. A. Walsh" writes: > > > > > Something seems to have changed on my network setup > (windows workstation using a linux-server for internet-interaction > including DNS running bind). > > For some reason when I look up a local host name, > > 'myputer'

howto have internal BIND resolve "host" (internal host name/no dots)?

Something seems to have changed on my network setup (windows workstation using a linux-server for internet-interaction including DNS running bind). For some reason when I look up a local host name, 'myputer' I can't get it to return an addr, and instead it appears to be querying root servers

Re: BIND 9.9.7 complains and dies if you use same zonefile for multiple zones

> Just to clarify: it will remain okay to use a zone file for multiple > master zones (which won't be dynamically updated)? Yes, that's fine. It's only a problem to use a single file when multiple different zones will be writing to it. -- Evan Hunt -- e...@isc.org Internet Systems Consortium, I

Re: BIND 9.9.7 complains and dies if you use same zonefile for multiple zones

In message <0a15d92c-fd29-4718-9094-c84147dd5...@googlegroups.com>, blrmaani writes : > Hi, > named exits with failure on my host when I try to use same physical file > for mu > ltiple zones: > > > /var/log/all look something like below ... - > starting BIND 9.10.2rc1 -u bin

BIND 9.9.7 complains and dies if you use same zonefile for multiple zones

Hi, named exits with failure on my host when I try to use same physical file for multiple zones: /var/log/all look something like below ... - starting BIND 9.10.2rc1 -u bind -t /var/named -f ... writeable file 'slave/zone1.txt': already in use: name.conf:1221 writeable file '