Re: own IPv6 zones but no IPv6 uplink - solved

2014-07-13 Thread Steffen Sledz
On 11.07.2014 17:59, Phil Mayers wrote: > On 11/07/14 16:45, Steffen Sledz wrote: >> We have a local DNS server providing local IPv6 zones (fd44:...). >> >> The server itself is reachable via IPv4 and IPv6 but has no IPv6 uplink. >> >> With our current configuration everything works well, but we've

Re: own IPv6 zones but no IPv6 uplink

2014-07-13 Thread Steffen Sledz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12.07.2014 01:56, Alan Clegg wrote: > On 7/11/14, 7:19 PM, Mark Andrews wrote: > >> For the record it isn't the zone. It's enabling IPv6 locally without having >> a working upstream link. You would get that message without the zone being >> con

Re: own IPv6 zones but no IPv6 uplink

2014-07-13 Thread Steffen Sledz
On 12.07.2014 01:19, Mark Andrews wrote: > In message <53c009d4.4000...@imperial.ac.uk>, Phil Mayers writes: >> On 11/07/14 16:45, Steffen Sledz wrote: >>> We have a local DNS server providing local IPv6 zones (fd44:...). >>> >>> The server itself is reachable via IPv4 and IPv6 but has no IPv6 upli

Re: initial lookup fails every time

2014-07-13 Thread Mike Hoskins (michoski)
-Original Message- From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas Date: Sunday, July 13, 2014 at 6:24 AM To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org" Subject: Re: initial lookup fails every time >On 12.07.14 01:19, Tony Publiski wrote: >> I'm hoping someone has seen this before. I'm running a couple of BIND >> 9.8.2 DN

Re: Public facing authoritative NS all masters

2014-07-13 Thread Joseph S D Yao
On 2014-07-13 12:11, Gary Wallis wrote: Hello, What are the drawbacks, if any, of running only master name servers for the set of authoritative NSs? For example given: [root@rc37 unxsVZ]# dig latimes.com NS +short dns1.tribune.com. dns2.tribune.com. dns4.tribune.com. dns3.tribune.com. Where a

Re: Public facing authoritative NS all masters

2014-07-13 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 12.07.2014 16:11, schrieb Gary Wallis: > DNS experts, > > What are the drawbacks, if any, of running only master name servers for the > set of authoritative NSs? > > For example given: > > [root@rc37 unxsVZ]# dig latimes.com NS +short > dns1.tribune.com. > dns2.tribune.com. > dns4.tribune.

Re: Public facing authoritative NS all masters

2014-07-13 Thread Mike Hoskins (michoski)
-Original Message- From: Gary Wallis Date: Sunday, July 13, 2014 at 12:11 PM To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org" Subject: Public facing authoritative NS all masters >Hello, > >What are the drawbacks, if any, of running only master name servers for >the set of authoritative NSs? > >For example

Public facing authoritative NS all masters

2014-07-13 Thread Gary Wallis
Hello, What are the drawbacks, if any, of running only master name servers for the set of authoritative NSs? For example given: [root@rc37 unxsVZ]# dig latimes.com NS +short dns1.tribune.com. dns2.tribune.com. dns4.tribune.com. dns3.tribune.com. Where all 4 dnsN servers are in fact masters (

Re: initial lookup fails every time

2014-07-13 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 12.07.14 01:19, Tony Publiski wrote: I'm hoping someone has seen this before. I'm running a couple of BIND 9.8.2 DNS servers and having an issue with them for some reason. The servers end up failing to lookup on the initial lookup of a domain that hasn't been previously cached every time. If