In message <20140528012734.ga55...@redoubt.spodhuis.org>, Phil Pennock writes:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> The registrar for my zone "xn--qck5b9a5eml3bze.jp" required a DNSSEC
> KSK update; good practice on their part.
For most zones you never need to roll DNSSEC keys
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
The registrar for my zone "xn--qck5b9a5eml3bze.jp" required a DNSSEC
KSK update; good practice on their part. My first rollover, though.
I've ended up with all records being signed by the new KSK, apparently
through an algorithm mismatch, and I'm no
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 7:31 PM, Baird, Josh wrote:
> Cricket's "DNS & BIND" seems rather dated at this point with the last edition
> over 8 years old.
Basics are still the same though -- there are some new things like
RPZ, RRL, some new RR types, etc -- but a good solid grasp of the
fundamental
Cricket's "DNS & BIND" seems rather dated at this point with the last edition
over 8 years old.
Josh
-Original Message-
From: Warren Kumari [mailto:war...@kumari.net]
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2014 7:24 PM
To: Baird, Josh
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: Book recomendations?
On T
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 6:51 PM, Baird, Josh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can someone recommend a modern/new-ish book on DNS (specifically BIND)? I
> know there have been several O'Reily books throughout the years, but haven't
> kept up on anything in the past few years. I'm looking for architecture
> de
Sort of comes with a book
https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-00845/0/BIND-9.9-Administrator-Reference-Manual-ARM.html
which is quite good. For newbs in the field I say two or more of
everything and at least one hidden master. Use views internally and
IPv6 better be on your roadmap.
On Tue, May 27,
Hi,
Can someone recommend a modern/new-ish book on DNS (specifically BIND)? I know
there have been several O'Reily books throughout the years, but haven't kept up
on anything in the past few years. I'm looking for architecture design, best
practices in designing enterprise and service provide
Amir,
No, I haven't found any tunings work on BIND 9.10. I filed a bug (ISC-Bugs
#35961) against ISC for them to investigate. By the way, are you running RHEL
as well?
Until the performance issue with 9.10 gets fixed, we will stick with 9.9.x.
On Tuesday, May 27, 2014 9:10 AM, "a...@localhost.m
Shawn,
Same with us here. We tested using bind 9.9.5 the recursive queries can reach
10,000 qps and when using 9.10-P1/9.10 .. we only can burst at 3,000 QPS..
Have you find any solution to share with us?
Thanks
amir
On Saturday, May 3, 2014 4:42:30 AM UTC+8, Shawn Zhou wrote:
> I was hopin
9 matches
Mail list logo
