-Original Message-
From: Mike Bernhardt
Date: Thursday, January 16, 2014 4:09 PM
To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org"
Subject: RE: Upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4
>Sorry for the double post, but I forgot to ask this:
>And if it is indeed enabled regardless of my RFC1918 ranges, I would
>imagine
Sorry for the double post, but I forgot to ask this:
And if it is indeed enabled regardless of my RFC1918 ranges, I would imagine
that for my internal servers which have those ranges, I would want to add
"disable-empty-zone ".";" to my global options? And for my external-facing
server which of cour
Am I correct in understanding that the change to "enabled by default" was in
9.9.x, not in 9.8.x? The 9.9.x specifically states that is enabled by
default whereas the 9.8.x documentation does not.
-Original Message-
From: Lawrence K. Chen, P.Eng. [mailto:lkc...@ksu.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, Jan
On 01/16/2014 06:01 AM, Mark Andrews wrote:
In message
, Oleg Gvozdev writes:
Hello.
I have dynamic zone. And A record in it:
Example(pseudo-code):
*zone myzone.*
* a 10.0.0.1 domain xxx*
Then I made DHCP update for host "host.myzone." and it receives address
from dynamic range (10.0.0.1
On 01/15, Bill Owens wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 07:55:44PM -0500, Kevin Darcy wrote:
> > Loopback is anti-social; an apparent attempt to make the client
> > waste resources connecting to itself. In legal terms, one might call
> > this an "attractive nuisance".
>
> You're quite right; that's
In message
, Oleg Gvozdev writes:
> Hello.
>
> I have dynamic zone. And A record in it:
>
> Example(pseudo-code):
>
>
> *zone myzone.*
> * a 10.0.0.1 domain xxx*
>
> Then I made DHCP update for host "host.myzone." and it receives address
> from dynamic range (10.0.0.10-10.0.0.100), for exam
Hello.
I have dynamic zone. And A record in it:
Example(pseudo-code):
*zone myzone.*
* a 10.0.0.1 domain xxx*
Then I made DHCP update for host "host.myzone." and it receives address
from dynamic range (10.0.0.10-10.0.0.100), for example: 10.0.0.10.
So host.myzone. has 2 A records: 10.0.0.1
In article ,
Warren Kumari wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Blason R wrote:
> > Hi Folks,
> >
> > I am not sure if this is an appropriate forum to answer since more or less
> > it is pertaining to Go Daddy support but since its a huge community our
> > there and I am sure many of them
8 matches
Mail list logo