On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 11:08:33 -0500, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 10:06:07AM +0100, Phil Mayers wrote:
>> On 10/13/2013 10:34 PM, John Oliver wrote:
>>
>> >Venting aside, does anyone have a contact at GoDaddy that doesn't
>> >suffer from a terminal case of rectal-cranial invesrion?
>
On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 11:08:33 -0500, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 10:06:07AM +0100, Phil Mayers wrote:
>> On 10/13/2013 10:34 PM, John Oliver wrote:
>>
>> >Venting aside, does anyone have a contact at GoDaddy that doesn't
>> >suffer from a terminal case of rectal-cranial invesrion?
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/14/13 12:39 PM, Alan Clegg wrote:
>> In this case, I started with a serial of 2013092700, incremented
>> it to 2013092701, and reloaded. 'dig soa' would still return
>> 2013092700.
>>
>> Problem is, bind logged the current serial number as 2013
On Oct 14, 2013, at 9:12 PM, David Newman wrote:
> Thanks very much for your responses. Per my comments inline below,
> this actually wasn't broken to begin with, but I just wasn't seeing it.
8-) No problems.
> > So, I'm going to jump back a bit here If the configuration that
> > you post
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Alan,
Thanks very much for your responses. Per my comments inline below,
this actually wasn't broken to begin with, but I just wasn't seeing it.
On 10/14/13 10:43 AM, Alan Clegg wrote:
>
> On Oct 13, 2013, at 9:03 PM, David Newman
> wrote:
>
>>
On Oct 14, 2013, at 7:43 PM, Alan Clegg wrote:
> == Commands typed ==
> root@server00:/etc/namedb# ls
> bind.keys keys master named.conf rndc.key
> root@server00:/etc/namedb# cd master
> root@server00:/etc/namedb/master# ls
> example.com example.com.jbk example.com.signed example.com.sign
On Oct 13, 2013, at 9:03 PM, David Newman wrote:
> >>> This is where things fall apart. I run 'rndc freeze' and
> >>> increment the zone file's serial number (or make any other
> >>> change), and then run 'rndc thaw' and 'rndc reload'.
So, I'm going to jump back a bit here If the configurat
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 10:06:07AM +0100, Phil Mayers wrote:
> On 10/13/2013 10:34 PM, John Oliver wrote:
>
> >Venting aside, does anyone have a contact at GoDaddy that doesn't
> >suffer from a terminal case of rectal-cranial invesrion?
>
> GoDaddy are... not good. I would not have high hopes of
On 10/13/2013 10:34 PM, John Oliver wrote:
Venting aside, does anyone have a contact at GoDaddy that doesn't suffer
from a terminal case of rectal-cranial invesrion? I'm mainly
experimenting with DNSSEC, and don't want to move all of my domains over
this one issue. But then, if this is the lev
9 matches
Mail list logo
