On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 9:22 PM, Samuel Lentz wrote:
> Thanks. It looks to be good. I did find this once and thought is was to
> good to be true. But after verifying the code is the same, I will be using
> this for further updates.
>
> I understand that CentOS if suppose to be a complete copy of
Thanks. It looks to be good. I did find this once and thought is was to
good to be true. But after verifying the code is the same, I will be using
this for further updates.
I understand that CentOS if suppose to be a complete copy of Red Hat down
to the software versions, but don't understand why
Je suis absent jusqu'au 23 Août 2013 inclus. En cas d'urgence, vous pouvez
contacter RASOAMANANA Ranto (Mob: +261320701232, e-mail:
ranto.rasoaman...@orange.com).
Confidentiality:
This email is intended for the above-na
Dave Warren wrote:
>
> Change the zones from master to slave in your named.conf? There really isn't
> much more to it than that, assuming you have a new authoritative master is
> already configured and serving the zones.
However, beware that BIND 9.9 defaults to "raw" zone files for slaved
zones,
4 matches
Mail list logo