Ive started having some issues with one of my subnets. Im seeing messages
like the following in my log files:
clients-per-query increased to 15
I did a little googling and found where this is adjustable per the
named.conf. I currently dont have anything in my named.conf that outlines
this. Im
Looking at rndc stats output on an older BIND 9.3 nameserver versus output on a
new BIND 9.7 nameserver.
It seems that the 9.3 and 9.7 referrals and failures are flipped in rndc stats
output.
Does that make sense?
On the 9.3 nameserver I see a boatload of referrals and almost no failures.
On
Hello,
I'd like to change the DNS operator for a signed domain, where the
parent does not allow a DS that is not pointing to an active DNSKEY
(thus the double-DS procedure won't work).
As a result I'd need to insert the old DNSKEYs in the new zone. However,
bind tries to do something with them, a
In article ,
wbr...@e1b.org wrote:
And then there's theses folks:
http://no-www.org/
On 04/08/2013 06:42 AM, Sam Wilson wrote:
Is co-opting high-level name space for a single protocol a modern-day
landgrab?
On 08.04.13 20:58, Doug Barton wrote:
Is holding on to the antiquated notion that
On 04/08/2013 06:59 PM, Novosielski, Ryan wrote:
Someone can correct me if I'm wrong, but I think they'd be right if
and only if the webserver they're adding the A record for happens to
also be the AD server.
In principle that's correct.
In practice, running a publicly accessible webserver on
5 matches
Mail list logo