On 02/15/2013 03:40 PM, Chris Buxton wrote:
On Feb 15, 2013, at 9:57 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I will do some more testing with this to see if I can indeed remove the
root.hint includes. But I have a question. I have tried to dig in my server
for the root info like you can a root server,
On Feb 15, 2013, at 3:56 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>>
>> The hostname 'localhost' can mean different things to different computers.
>> It probably means ::1 (IPv6 localhost) in this case. Try explicitly
>> specifying the IP address rather than using the hostname.
>
> Appearently so. Very
On 02/15/2013 03:40 PM, Chris Buxton wrote:
On Feb 15, 2013, at 9:57 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I will do some more testing with this to see if I can indeed remove the
root.hint includes. But I have a question. I have tried to dig in my server
for the root info like you can a root server,
On Feb 15, 2013, at 9:57 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> I will do some more testing with this to see if I can indeed remove the
> root.hint includes. But I have a question. I have tried to dig in my server
> for the root info like you can a root server, but obviously this is not the
> way to do
I have been getting this warning, and wonder why?
I have read:
https://kb.isc.org/.../Why-does-named-log-an-error-disabling-RFC-1918-empty-zones-when-starting-up.html
I have a 128.168.192.in-addr.arpa.zone zone in my internal view. So
what might I be missing? Do I need to create my own deleg
-Original Message-
From: Robert Moskowitz
Date: Friday, February 15, 2013 1:33 PM
To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org"
Subject: Randoming ports and firewall rules
>So it is past time for me to only use port 53 and support port
>randomization. But I do run iptables (and ip6tables) and the ser
I commented out include for the root.hints and things are working still
so obviously it is built in even though the string search is not working
on my binary.
On 02/15/2013 12:57 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 02/15/2013 12:37 PM, Chris Buxton wrote:
On Feb 14, 2013, at 8:49 AM, Shawn Bakh
So it is past time for me to only use port 53 and support port
randomization. But I do run iptables (and ip6tables) and the server
sits behind a Juniper SSG firewall.
Where are there instructions for setting up iptables for port randomization
and for general firewall rules (I doubt I will fin
I am now running without chroot and relying on selinux for protection.
I created a /etc/named.d/ directory for all my many includes in
named.conf which I know I have to keep in /etc/
My rndc.key is in /etc/named.d/ and is an include in my named.conf. When
I first started bind, it reported tha
On 02/15/2013 12:37 PM, Chris Buxton wrote:
On Feb 14, 2013, at 8:49 AM, Shawn Bakhtiar wrote:
Running bind rooted on FC 16 using the standard package.
The ca file is located in /var/named/chroot/var/named/named.ca
The hints are not built in.
[shawn@www ~]$ strings /usr/sbin/named | grepA.
On Feb 14, 2013, at 11:46 AM, Mailinglists wrote:
> I'm looking to migrate all of the zone data from one installation of Bind to
> another...hardware move. One machine is very old but running a pretty modern
> version of Bind 9.6-ESV-R8. The other server is running Bind 9.8.2 and is in
> use, so
On Feb 14, 2013, at 8:49 AM, Shawn Bakhtiar wrote:
>
> Running bind rooted on FC 16 using the standard package.
>
> The ca file is located in /var/named/chroot/var/named/named.ca
>
> The hints are not built in.
> [shawn@www ~]$ strings /usr/sbin/named | grep A.ROOT-SERVERS.NET
> returns nothi
We're seeing email failures to outlook.uga.edu.
dig uga.edu +nssearch shows only dns3.uga.edu responds with an soa record.
and
dig -t mx outlook.uga.edu @dns3.uga.edu returns an mx record.
outlook.uga.edu.86400 IN MX 10 707341637.mail.outlook.com.
And we see a proble
-Original Message-
From: Jan-Piet Mens
Date: Friday, February 15, 2013 12:57 AM
To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org"
Subject: BIND9 statistics-server: JSON?
>As a fan of BIND's statistics-server I was tempted to see if I could
>reduce the size of the data (XML) named produces by adding an opt
* Thomas Leuxner 2013.02.11 21:13:
> * Evan Hunt 2013.02.11 20:30:
>
> > I haven't seen this problem before. Can you share the rest of
> > your configuration with me? You can open a ticket by mailing
> > bind9-b...@isc.org.
>
> Config sent.
>
> Regards
> Thomas
Finally found the root of th
On 15 Feb 2013, at 05:57, Jan-Piet Mens wrote:
> would there be a chance of ISC adding this to stock
> BIND9? Even better: would ISC take on the work of doing it? ;-)
FWIW: +1
/Niall
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/list
Hi,
Let me introduce myself,
My name is Arie L. Putra, I’m a data network engineer at a EVDO operator.
We are using BIND 9.3.6 ( a bit old yes), for our caching-only name server, we
are not maintaining authoritatives.
We are not monitoring our DNS Server using:
1. Cacti (for traffi
17 matches
Mail list logo
