Re: Disabling A records for IPv6?

2012-12-28 Thread Robin Lee Powell
Ah, it's ... a lot worse than I thought; here's the relevant node.js bug: https://github.com/joyent/node/issues/4168 I knew node.js was made by twelve year olds, but even so... Words fail me. -Robin On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 12:53:51AM +, Phil Mayers wrote: > [Grumble stupid mobile devices .

Re: Disabling A records for IPv6?

2012-12-28 Thread Robin Lee Powell
Here's the digging my ISP did: [root@dvs-node01 ~]# node > var dns = require('dns') undefined > dns.resolve('github.com', function(e, h) { console.log(JSON.stringify(h)) } ) { oncomplete: [Function: onanswer] } > ["207.97.227.239"] undefined > dns.resolve6('github.com', function(e, h) { console.l

Re: Disabling A records for IPv6?

2012-12-28 Thread Phil Mayers
[Grumble stupid mobile devices ...] ...I'm assuming you're deliberately engaging in a learning exercise and don't want the rest of your experiments to be held up waiting for this one issue to be fixed. But please do hassle the app vendor/devs to fix their broken stuff. Tbh I'm still a bit dubio

Re: Disabling A records for IPv6?

2012-12-28 Thread Phil Mayers
Not hard - rpz zone with a single record will do it. I'm not typing on an ideal device to give an example right now, I'm afraid ... Mark is of course correct that v6-only is a struggle right now and that fixing the apps is the proper solution. But I'm Robin Lee Powell wrote: >On Fri, Dec 28,

Re: Disabling A records for IPv6?

2012-12-28 Thread Mark Andrews
Truly, one should be fixing the applications not mucking with DNS responses. DNS servers do not know the purpose of the A record lookup so changing it in the server may break other applications. Additionally doing this will break applications using DNSSEC. There is no good reason to be IPv6 o

Re: Disabling A records for IPv6?

2012-12-28 Thread Robin Lee Powell
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 07:57:24PM +, Phil Mayers wrote: > Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > > > >So I've got some IPv6-only VMs set up that need to talk to the > >general internet for things like downloading packages. As you > >can imagine, this requires that they have NAT64 and DNS64, > >because

Re: FW: Named stopped loging?

2012-12-28 Thread Mike Hale
Just out of curiosity, what ended up being the problem? On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Manson, John wrote: > I would like to retract this post after I had a long conversation with > my co-worker who is just back from leave. > > Sorry for the bother. > > ** ** > > *From:* Manson, John

Re: Disabling A records for IPv6?

2012-12-28 Thread Phil Mayers
Robin Lee Powell wrote: > >So I've got some IPv6-only VMs set up that need to talk to the >general internet for things like downloading packages. As you can >imagine, this requires that they have NAT64 and DNS64, because lots >and lots of things are IPv4 only. > >The problem is that many things

FW: Named stopped loging?

2012-12-28 Thread Manson, John
I would like to retract this post after I had a long conversation with my co-worker who is just back from leave. Sorry for the bother. From: Manson, John Sent: Friday, December 28, 2012 10:54 AM To: 'bind-users@lists.isc.org' Subject: Named stopped loging? Good Day Running 9.9.2 for about a mon

Disabling A records for IPv6?

2012-12-28 Thread Robin Lee Powell
So I've got some IPv6-only VMs set up that need to talk to the general internet for things like downloading packages. As you can imagine, this requires that they have NAT64 and DNS64, because lots and lots of things are IPv4 only. The problem is that many things do *stupid shit* when given both

Named stopped loging?

2012-12-28 Thread Manson, John
Good Day Running 9.9.2 for about a month now with no worries. Today I noticed only the reload message in the namedlog and not the zone messages that are usually there after stopping and restarting the named process. Worked fine on the 26th but not today. Logs sample: Dec 26 15:01:52 local@mercu