Hello Alan -
It's also worth noting that, since I have more IPs on the box than the
ones that are designated as nameservers, and since I have dns listening
on all addresses, I can query named using one of the non-nameserver IPs
- and it works fine! For instance:
nslookup x.x.x.29 y.y.y.114
S
Hello Alan -
I will do an upgrade as soon as I get chance - a bit tied up right now.
But in any case, since I posted this I've done some query logging for a
bit and find that I'm getting an average of about 60 queries per second.
All the dns queries are coming in via udp - the connections I me
On Nov 10, 2012, at 1:39 PM, Ed LaFrance wrote:
> When I check the router above this server I'll see 200 - 500 legitimate
> connections to this server at any given time.
Having sent my snarky "update" e-mail, I now ask... you say later in the mail
that you are doing about 20 queries per secon
On Nov 10, 2012, at 1:39 PM, Ed LaFrance wrote:
> Running BIND 9.3.6-P1-RedHat-9.3.6-16.P1.el5
Before everyone else says it... upgrade.
AlanC
--
Alan Clegg | +1-919-355-8851 | a...@clegg.com
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
__
Hello all -
First post to this list, hope I'm on the right place.
Running BIND 9.3.6-P1-RedHat-9.3.6-16.P1.el5 on a quadcore xeon server
(3Ghz) with 2GB RAM. Named is being used only for rDNS queries against
our address space.
The issue is that named is not keeping up with rdns requests. The
5 matches
Mail list logo
