The reason I did the full discussion is that many shops are moving from
proprietary UNIX (Solaris, AIX, HP-UX) or Windows to Linux solutions.If
they are moving much infrastructure but just starting with BIND then he needs
to consider what I wrote.
Also I don't really agree that Ubuntu is th
> One idea would be to use RHEL but still download and compile your own BIND on
> top of it.
Yup, IIRC there are (S)RPM for latest bind versios posted on this list.
> However, if the only thing on your RHEL server is BIND you have to wonder
> why you're paying RedHat a subscription.
Yeah. If
We use RHEL mainly because that's our distro of choice for most of our
applications. It is the most popular "commercial" distro is the one most 3rd
party commercial applications (e.g. Oracle) support. (Of course SLES has a
lot of support as well but not quite a much - others will tell you Ubu
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Graham Butler wrote:
> We are currently looking at replacing our Solaris boxes with a flavour of
> Linux to run BIND with a focus on Red Hat and Ubuntu. I am trying to collect
> some evidence to which OS is being used to run BIND and why, before we make
> a decision
We are currently looking at replacing our Solaris boxes with a flavour of Linux
to run BIND with a focus on Red Hat and Ubuntu. I am trying to collect some
evidence to which OS is being used to run BIND and why, before we make a
decision. Could you please respond by sending me, or the list, info
5 matches
Mail list logo
