Introduction
BIND 9.7.7rc1 is the first release candidate of BIND 9.7.7
This document summarizes changes from BIND 9.7.6 to BIND 9.7.7rc1.
Please see the CHANGES file in the source code release for a
complete list of all changes.
Download
The latest versions of BIND 9 software c
Introduction
BIND 9.6-ESV-R8rc1 is the first release candidate of BIND
9.6-ESV-R8.
BIND 9.6-ESV is an Extended Support Version of BIND.
This document summarizes changes from BIND 9.6-ESV-R7 to BIND
9.6-ESV-R8rc1. Please see the CHANGES file in the source code
release for a com
Introduction
BIND 9.8.4rc1 is the first release candidate of BIND 9.8.4
This document summarizes changes from BIND 9.8.3 to BIND 9.8.4rc1.
Please see the CHANGES file in the source code release for a
complete list of all changes.
Download
The latest versions of BIND 9 software ca
Introduction
BIND 9.9.2rc1 is the first release candidate of BIND 9.9.2.
This document summarizes changes from BIND 9.9.1 to BIND 9.9.2rc1.
Please see the CHANGES file in the source code release for a
complete list of all changes.
Download
The latest versions of BIND 9 software c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
FWIW, 9.6 ships with Solaris 10.
On 09/05/2012 12:44 PM, Kevin Darcy wrote:
> On 9/5/2012 10:19 AM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>> In message
>> <7e1c5160a2aa122a39e879c8343bf459.squir...@webmail.aminor.no>,
>> "Eivi nd Olsen" writes:
>>> Mark Andrews wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Solaris 9 is no longer supported, forget 8. It's time to upgrade (and
not even hard).
On 09/05/2012 09:39 AM, Yohandry Cueto wrote:
> You dont need to upgrade the OS to get EDNS support.
>
> If you get a current version of Bind compiled and running i
> I can verify that relatively-modern versions of BIND (e.g. some 9.8.*
> versions) compile with gcc on Solaris 9. I don't have any access to a
> Solaris 8 box with a compiler though...
I have built various releases of BIND up to 9.8.1 on Solaris 8 using
gcc 2.95.3.
On 9/5/2012 10:19 AM, Mark Andrews wrote:
In message <7e1c5160a2aa122a39e879c8343bf459.squir...@webmail.aminor.no>, "Eivi
nd Olsen" writes:
Mark Andrews wrote:
SunOS 5.8 is ancient (12+ year old)and no longer supported by Oracle.
I can't remember which version of BIND 8, SunOS 5.8 shipped with
In message <7e1c5160a2aa122a39e879c8343bf459.squir...@webmail.aminor.no>, "Eivi
nd Olsen" writes:
> Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> > SunOS 5.8 is ancient (12+ year old)and no longer supported by Oracle.
> > I can't remember which version of BIND 8, SunOS 5.8 shipped with
> > but it wasn't a recent versi
Mark Andrews wrote:
> SunOS 5.8 is ancient (12+ year old)and no longer supported by Oracle.
> I can't remember which version of BIND 8, SunOS 5.8 shipped with
> but it wasn't a recent version at the time.
Not that it really matters much, but I thought I'd check some old Solaris
8 installation I s
You dont need to upgrade the OS to get EDNS support.
If you get a current version of Bind compiled and running in your
actual system, you will
be good to go.
People are just reminding you that Oracle no longer support Solaris
5.8, upgrading the system
is up to you, but not necessary in from Bind
In message
, syed haq writes:
>
> That means I need to completely upgrade the OS to make the EDNS support
No. Please re-read what I said.
Mark
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> >
> > In message > m4nanq_k3exkz...@mail.gmail.com>
> > , syed haq writes:
> > >
> > >
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 04:29:25PM +0300,
syed haq wrote
a message of 769 lines which said:
> That means I need to completely upgrade the OS to make the EDNS support
Personal opinion: you need to follow a serious Unix sysadmin training
first. From your messages, it seems you are a beginner. M
That means I need to completely upgrade the OS to make the EDNS support
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> In message m4nanq_k3exkz...@mail.gmail.com>
> , syed haq writes:
> >
> > Thanks ,
> >
> > what if I replaced named,will EDNS starts supporting my server ?
>
> If you
In message
, syed haq writes:
>
> Thanks ,
>
> what if I replaced named,will EDNS starts supporting my server ?
If you replace it with a version that supports EDNS. All versions
of BIND 9 support EDNS. A modern version of BIND 9 should compile
on SunOS 5.8 but it has been several years since
Thanks ,
what if I replaced named,will EDNS starts supporting my server ?
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> In message <
> cajw6aqbk-ypt7bcuzy+vovy3bda2gjg7yzz792zf6xpmf6r...@mail.gmail.com>
> , syed haq writes:
> >
> > Hi
> > shoul I need to add any statement in the bind
In message
, syed haq writes:
>
> Hi
> shoul I need to add any statement in the bind to activate the EDNS0,
>
> Where do I find this EDNS statement in Sunos
This is like you have a car with a plain AM/FM radio and you need
to replace the radio with a new one that supports AF/FM/CD/Bluetooth/ph
Hi
shoul I need to add any statement in the bind to activate the EDNS0,
Where do I find this EDNS statement in Sunos
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 11:11:43AM +0300,
> syed haq wrote
> a message of 134 lines which said:
>
> > That means
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 11:11:43AM +0300,
syed haq wrote
a message of 134 lines which said:
> That means EDNS is not supported by that var of SunOS ,can you give
> me the commands for checking the ENDS,BIND version in sunos
I already gave them (dig). You simply cannot expect to solve *any* DN
thank
That means EDNS is not supported by that var of SunOS ,can you give me the
commands for checking the ENDS,BIND version in sunos
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> In message <20120905071700.ga2...@nic.fr>, Stephane Bortzmeyer writes:
> > On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 10:01
In message <20120905071700.ga2...@nic.fr>, Stephane Bortzmeyer writes:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 10:01:45AM +0300,
> syed haq wrote
> a message of 66 lines which said:
>
> > EDNS not supported by ***.**.**.**
>
> 1) Test your name server to be sure the diagnostic is correct:
>
> dig +bufsiz
the error is dig not found
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 10:01:45AM +0300,
> syed haq wrote
> a message of 66 lines which said:
>
> > EDNS not supported by ***.**.**.**
>
> 1) Test your name server to be sure the diagnostic is correct:
>
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 10:01:45AM +0300,
syed haq wrote
a message of 66 lines which said:
> EDNS not supported by ***.**.**.**
1) Test your name server to be sure the diagnostic is correct:
dig +bufsize=4096 @YOUR-NAME-SERVER SOA YOUR-DOMAIN
You should get in the answer something like:
;;
In message
, syed haq
writes:
> Hi
>
> When I enter the query for the client in the RIPE DataBase for the Reverse
> DNS ,the Error getting is
> EDNS not supported by ***.**.**.**
>
>
> EDNS is an extension to the DNS protocol. The major change
> is that the 512-byte size lim
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 07:51:05AM +0100,
Phil Mayers wrote
a message of 18 lines which said:
> See also:
>
> http://publicsuffix.org/
And remember it is unofficial, not perfectly maintained and has
several holes. It's OK if you accept a few misclassifications.
_
Hi
When I enter the query for the client in the RIPE DataBase for the Reverse
DNS ,the Error getting is
EDNS not supported by ***.**.**.**
EDNS is an extension to the DNS protocol. The major change
is that the 512-byte size limit of the query/answer packet has
been rem
26 matches
Mail list logo
