Re: Reverse zone delegation for 172.16.16.0/20 - HOW TO?

2012-05-20 Thread Ellad G. Yatsko
Dear Barry! I tried to delegate 172.16.16.0/ doing the following on the central site: $ORIGIN 16.172.in-addr.arpa. $GENREATE 16-31 $ NS srvgate.sokol.msk.united-networks.ru. It works! :-) You are right! :-) But I don't understand what do I need do on "sokol.msk"-server? Do I need create 16 inde

RE: DNS behind firewall

2012-05-20 Thread Saif Ahmed
Hi Kevin, Thanks for your reply, It's worked now after flushing the iptables using iptables -f Regards Saif -Original Message- From: bind-users-bounces+smohammed=cmc...@lists.isc.org [mailto:bind-users-bounces+smohammed=cmc...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Kevin Darcy Sent: Sunday, May 20

RE: Bind 9 configuration

2012-05-20 Thread Spain, Dr. Jeffry A.
> (I hope that it's fine to ask about issues connected with the previous > version of bind.) Bind9 has its own listserv at bind-users@lists.isc.org. There are many DNS experts available there. > Could you confirm that my settings are correct? > I'm using this guide (my configuration scenario is

Re: DNS behind firewall

2012-05-20 Thread Kevin Darcy
On 5/20/2012 10:07 AM, Saif Ahmed wrote: Hi, I have configured authuritive only DNS, It's respond well internally But not answer the public quires, options { directory "/etc/named"; // version statement - inhibited for security // (avoids hacking any known weaknesses) version "not cu

DNS behind firewall

2012-05-20 Thread Saif Ahmed
Hi, I have configured authuritive only DNS, It's respond well internally But not answer the public quires, options { directory "/etc/named"; // version statement - inhibited for security // (avoids hacking any known weaknesses) version "not currently available"; // allows notifies onl