Re: SRV record "(out of zone) is a CNAME (illegal)"

2011-10-10 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <322681e404789f1307553936e4e18...@webmail.enigmedia.com>, "enigmedia " writes: > Hi All: I'm trying to set up a SRV record for a zone, and when I run checkzon > e I > see the following error: > > [root@default root]# named-checkzone -w /var/named mydomain.com db.mydomain.c > om > db.my

SRV record "(out of zone) is a CNAME (illegal)"

2011-10-10 Thread enigmedia
Hi All: I'm trying to set up a SRV record for a zone, and when I run checkzone I see the following error: [root@default root]# named-checkzone -w /var/named mydomain.com db.mydomain.com db.mydomain.com:13: TTL set to prior TTL (3600) zone mydomain.com/IN: _sipfederationtls._tcp.mydomain.com/SRV 's

Re: bind error

2011-10-10 Thread Mark Andrews
It's a known issue and the fix is part of the next maintence release. 3154. [bug] Attempting to print an empty rdataset could trigger an assert. [RT #25452] -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742

bind error

2011-10-10 Thread Mosharaf
Dear Concern, I have running bind 9.7.3 on debian. I also running dump.db. While I am running dump.db for bind log it give error like that critical: masterdump.c:419: REQUIRE(result == 0) failed, back trace 11-Oct-2011 04:32:15.258 general: critical: #0 0x4259af in ?? 11-Oct-2011 04:32:15.2

Re: changing ttl of mx record

2011-10-10 Thread Kevin Darcy
On 10/10/2011 11:13 AM, enigmedia wrote: On 10/10/2011 9:26 AM, Albert E. Whale, CHS CISA CISSP wrote: If you are going to update the IP and TTL, why not adjust both? This will take care of some broken DNS packages. Hth Thanks, I had googled around a bit and saw some conflicting opinions abo

Re: nsupdate on a Windows ec2 instance to update dynamic DNS isn't working

2011-10-10 Thread kallen
On Sat, 08 Oct 2011, Mark Andrews wrote: > Make sure that the "send" line has a end of line. Many windows editors > don't add a end of line unlike unix editors that do. that was it. thank you! > In message <20111007221843.gq28...@dradis.groknaut.net>, kal...@groknaut.net > wr > ites: > >

Re: changing ttl of mx record

2011-10-10 Thread enigmedia
On 10/10/2011 9:26 AM, Albert E. Whale, CHS CISA CISSP wrote: > If you are going to update the IP and TTL, why not adjust both? This will take care of some broken DNS packages. > > Hth Thanks, I had googled around a bit and saw some conflicting opinions about whether TTL'ing the MX was necessary o

Re: changing ttl of mx record

2011-10-10 Thread Albert E. Whale, CHS CISA CISSP
If you are going to update the IP and TTL, why not adjust both? This will take care of some broken DNS packages. Hth Sent from my iPhone On Oct 10, 2011, at 10:42 AM, "enigmedia" wrote: > Hi All: If I need to set a short TTL prior to an MX IP change, do I need to > modify the TTL of the MX r

Re: changing ttl of mx record

2011-10-10 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 10/10/2011 15:42, enigmedia wrote: > Hi All: If I need to set a short TTL prior to an MX IP change, do I need to > modify the TTL of the MX record, or just the A record the MX points to? > (There's just a single A record for the MX). You want to drop the TTL on the RR where the data -- the RHS

changing ttl of mx record

2011-10-10 Thread enigmedia
Hi All: If I need to set a short TTL prior to an MX IP change, do I need to modify the TTL of the MX record, or just the A record the MX points to? (There's just a single A record for the MX). ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind