Re: big improvement in BIND9 auth-server startup time

2011-08-03 Thread Barry Finkel
Evan Hunt wrote last July 13: -- People who operate big authoritative name servers (particularly with large numbers of small zones, e.g., for domain hosting and parking), and have had trouble with slow startup, may find this information useful: http://www.isc.org/community/blog/201107/major-imp

Re: CVE-2011-1910 vs bind 9.6-ESV-R4-P3

2011-08-03 Thread Evan Hunt
> when i see this about the affected version by the CVE-2011-1910: 9.6: 9.6.3, > 9.6-ESV-R2, -R3, -R4, -R5b1 > does this mean that the 9.6-ESV-R4-P1 is affected? No, 9.6-ESV-R4-P1 is the patch release that fixes CVS-2011-1910. See http://www.isc.org/software/bind/advisories/cve-2011-1910, under "

Re: CVE-2011-1910 vs bind 9.6-ESV-R4-P3

2011-08-03 Thread Cathy Almond
On 03/08/11 10:25, Issam Harrathi wrote: > Hi all, > when i see this about the affected version by the CVE-2011-1910: 9.6: 9.6.3, > 9.6-ESV-R2, -R3, -R4, -R5b1 > does this mean that the 9.6-ESV-R4-P1 is affected? I know it's a bit unwieldy and large at the moment (we have thoughts on how to remedy

Re: CVE-2011-1910 vs bind 9.6-ESV-R4-P3

2011-08-03 Thread Torsten Segner
Am Wed, 3 Aug 2011 11:25:07 +0200 schrieb Issam Harrathi : > Hi all, > when i see this about the affected version by the CVE-2011-1910: 9.6: 9.6.3, > 9.6-ESV-R2, -R3, -R4, -R5b1 > does this mean that the 9.6-ESV-R4-P1 is affected? > > Thanks. > Issam Harrathi. No, because 9.6-ESV-R4-P1 is a pat

CVE-2011-1910 vs bind 9.6-ESV-R4-P3

2011-08-03 Thread Issam Harrathi
Hi all, when i see this about the affected version by the CVE-2011-1910: 9.6: 9.6.3, 9.6-ESV-R2, -R3, -R4, -R5b1 does this mean that the 9.6-ESV-R4-P1 is affected? Thanks. Issam Harrathi. ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users