Re: about AUTHORITY SECTION

On 07/07/11 04:56, pa...@laposte.net wrote: > > Hello, > > I got two different forms of AUTHORITY SECTION from the dig, for example, > > $ dig mydots.net @ns7.dnsbed.com > > ; <<>> DiG 9.4.2-P2.1 <<>> mydots.net @ns7.dnsbed.com > ;; global options: printcmd > ;; Got answer: > ;; ->>HEADER<<- o

Re: "Key : Delaying activation to match the DNSKEY TTL."

> Hmm, thanks for the explanation. However, for this case, while the > activation date was in the near future, the *publish* date was far in > the past. Apparently it thought this was the first time it was being published, anyway. That information doesn't come from the publication date but from b

about AUTHORITY SECTION

Hello, I got two different forms of AUTHORITY SECTION from the dig, for example, $ dig mydots.net @ns7.dnsbed.com ; <<>> DiG 9.4.2-P2.1 <<>> mydots.net @ns7.dnsbed.com ;; global options: printcmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 36520 ;; flags: qr aa rd; QUERY

Re: "Key : Delaying activation to match the DNSKEY TTL."

On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 07:34:22PM -0700, Evan Hunt wrote: > The key is being published now, and its activation date (i.e., when it > will start to be used to sign records) is in the near future: less than > the TTL of the DNSKEY record from now. > > When the key starts signing, then someone cou

Re: Doubt with towiresorted

On 7/6/2011 4:36 AM, Vignesh Gadiyar wrote: Got your point. I meant answer sections in the Response from the DNS server itself. It contains 4 sections namely Question, Answer, Authoritative and Additional sections right. I used the rrset-order in named.conf to set order to random which was norm

Re: update bind

> Can I upgrade our existing version 9.5 to 9.8 directly or do I have to do > multiple updates. You should have no trouble with a direct update, but if you want to be cautious, get 9.8.0-P4, build it but don't install it, and from within the build tree, run "bin/check/named-checkconf -z" on your e

Re: update bind

saravanan subramani wrote: > Can I upgrade our existing version 9.5 to 9.8 directly or do I have to do > multiple updates. You shouldn't need to do intermediate / multiple updates, no. You might need to go quickly over your named.conf, zonefiles etc., to make sure they still work with the new ver

update bind

Hi, Can I upgrade our existing version 9.5 to 9.8 directly or do I have to do multiple updates. Thanks ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org h

Re: named web statistics

Thanks! -- Hal King - h...@utk.edu Systems Administrator Office of Information Technology Systems: Business Information Systems The University of Tennessee 135D Kingston Pike Building 2309 Kingston Pk. Knoxville, TN 37996 Phone: 974-1599 On 7/6/11 11:15 AM, "Jeremy C. Reed" wrote: >On We

Re: named web statistics

On Wed, 6 Jul 2011, King, Harold Clyde (Hal) wrote: > I know there is a web front end to DNS stats, but I can not remember the > option in the named.conf that defines the port. > I'm running 9.8.0-P4 (just now being able to upgrade to a version that > supports the statistics) statistics-channels

named web statistics

Hi; I know there is a web front end to DNS stats, but I can not remember the option in the named.conf that defines the port. I'm running 9.8.0-P4 (just now being able to upgrade to a version that supports the statistics) Does anyone remember this? -- Hal King - h...@utk.edu

Re: a death loop with DNS query

On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 08:23:45AM -0500, Lyle Giese wrote a message of 56 lines which said: > That is not a loop at all. I disagree. As dig clearly says, there is an horizontal referral: the name servers are supposed to be authoritative for blogchina.org and mytest.blogchina.org but keep s

Re: a death loop with DNS query

On 7/6/2011 5:52 AM, Feng He wrote: When I dig this: dig s1.mytest.blogchina.org +trace I got many these info: mytest.blogchina.org. 600 IN NS ns1.dnsv5.com. mytest.blogchina.org. 600 IN NS ns2.dnsv5.com. ;; BAD (HORIZONTAL) REFERRAL ;; Received 95 bytes from 18

a death loop with DNS query

When I dig this: dig s1.mytest.blogchina.org +trace I got many these info: mytest.blogchina.org. 600 IN NS ns1.dnsv5.com. mytest.blogchina.org. 600 IN NS ns2.dnsv5.com. ;; BAD (HORIZONTAL) REFERRAL ;; Received 95 bytes from 183.60.59.217#53(ns1.dnsv5.com) in 6 ms

Re: Doubt with towiresorted

Got your point. I meant answer sections in the Response from the DNS server itself. It contains 4 sections namely Question, Answer, Authoritative and Additional sections right. I used the rrset-order in named.conf to set order to random which was normally Cyclic. The result was that only the answer