Mark,
On 02/06/2011 10:41 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
> Mark Andrews writes:
>>
>>>
Does your configuration also have an "allow-update" setting
(other than "none") for it, maybe only for the instance that
is giving you trouble? In that case BIND will take it that you
want it to do
In message <4d4ef872.6070...@restena.lu>, Gilles Massen writes:
> Chris,
>
> thanks for the hint, but:
>
>
> On 6/2/11 19:20 , Chris Thompson wrote:
> > On Feb 6 2011, Gilles Massen wrote:
> >
> >> I have a very peculiar behavior: a zone, signed by OpenDNSSEC and
> >> pushed to Bind 9.7.2-P3 by
Mark Andrews writes:
>
> In message <4d4ef872.6070...@restena.lu>, Gilles Massen writes:
> > Chris,
> >
> > thanks for the hint, but:
> >
> >
> > On 6/2/11 19:20 , Chris Thompson wrote:
> > > On Feb 6 2011, Gilles Massen wrote:
> > >
> > >> I have a very peculiar behavior: a zone, signed by Op
Chris,
thanks for the hint, but:
On 6/2/11 19:20 , Chris Thompson wrote:
On Feb 6 2011, Gilles Massen wrote:
I have a very peculiar behavior: a zone, signed by OpenDNSSEC and
pushed to Bind 9.7.2-P3 by scp was working fine. But now, completely
out of the blue, Bind decides to claim some auth
On Feb 6 2011, Gilles Massen wrote:
I have a very peculiar behavior: a zone, signed by OpenDNSSEC and pushed
to Bind 9.7.2-P3 by scp was working fine. But now, completely out of the
blue, Bind decides to claim some authority over the zone: the SOA RRSIG
(only that one) is scrapped, and this is
Hello,
I have a very peculiar behavior: a zone, signed by OpenDNSSEC and pushed
to Bind 9.7.2-P3 by scp was working fine. But now, completely out of the
blue, Bind decides to claim some authority over the zone: the SOA RRSIG
(only that one) is scrapped, and this is logged:
06-Feb-2011 15:10:
6 matches
Mail list logo