On 1/30/2011 4:41 AM, p...@mail.nsbeta.info wrote:
> listman,
> why this user has been always staying here for sending spams?
> Regards.
Things happen, spammers send junk, they are then unsubscribed from the
list as soon as we notice (and get back from the weekend).
All done, user zapped.
AlanC
In message ,
Chris Buxton writes:
> No, BIND 8 was broken this was also. This was fixed in BIND 9. As for
> non-BIND name servers, anything goes.
>
> Chris Buxton
> BlueCat Networks
It depended on the BIND 8 version. Running everything through the cache
cleaned up the answers the stub resolver
On Jan 30, 2011, at 1:47 PM, Vytautas Grigaliunas wrote:
> What is the status of "dotted" hostnames - i.e. a period in the hostname
> portion of a domain name ?
>
> At one point they were allowed, I believe ? What is the latest official RFC ?
Periods, or dots, act as dividers in a domain name,
In article ,
Vytautas Grigaliunas wrote:
> What is the status of "dotted" hostnames - i.e. a period in the hostname
> portion of a domain name ?
>
> At one point they were allowed, I believe ? What is the latest official RFC ?
I don't think they've every been allowed. Why would you need to d
What is the status of "dotted" hostnames - i.e. a period in the hostname
portion of a domain name ?
At one point they were allowed, I believe ? What is the latest official RFC ?
Thanks...
Vyto
- Original Message -
From: Barry Margolin
Date: Sunday, January 30, 2011 3:34 pm
Subject:
In article ,
Chris Buxton wrote:
> Correct, the requirement to start with a letter was removed ages ago.
> Witness 3com.com, which may have been the first.
Yes, I'm pretty sure they were the impetus for the change, paving the
way for 1-800-FLOWERS.COM years later.
--
Barry Margolin, bar...@a
There's nothing wrong with doing that. You would create delegation NS records
in the example.com zone:
dhcp6 NS some.name.server.
dhcp6 NS other.name.server.
You can of course use the same set of name servers as are authoritative for
example.com.
Chris Buxton
BlueCat Networks
On
Correct, the requirement to start with a letter was removed ages ago.
Witness 3com.com, which may have been the first.
Chris Buxton
BlueCat Networks
On 1/29/11, p...@mail.nsbeta.info wrote:
> Joseph S D Yao writes:
>
>>
>> The labels must follow the rules for ARPANET host names. They must
>> s
No, BIND 8 was broken this was also. This was fixed in BIND 9. As for
non-BIND name servers, anything goes.
Chris Buxton
BlueCat Networks
On 1/29/11, Barry Margolin wrote:
> In article ,
> p...@mail.nsbeta.info wrote:
>
>> The book "Pro DNS and BIND" says:
>>
>> If the caching server obtains i
Hi folks,
I have ddns setup in a testing env, its working.
ddns-domainname is dhcp6.example.com. Clients get assigned
host.dhcp6.example.com
My question is, is it "correct" to create a separate subdomain zone
specifically for dhcp6.example.com so example.com zone itself doesn't
have to be updated,
That is no longer the case. It doesn't respond authoritative on the first
query.
-Ben Croswell
On Jan 30, 2011 10:01 AM, "Kevin Oberman" wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-01-29 at 14:49 +0800, p...@mail.nsbeta.info wrote:
>> The book "Pro DNS and BIND" says:
>>
>> If the caching server obtains its data dire
On Sat, 2011-01-29 at 14:49 +0800, p...@mail.nsbeta.info wrote:
> The book "Pro DNS and BIND" says:
>
> If the caching server obtains its data directly from an authoritative DNS,
> then it too will respond as authoritative. Ohterwise, if the data is
> supplied from its cache, the response is no
From RFC 1123
One aspect of host name syntax is hereby changed: the
restriction on the first character is relaxed to allow either a
letter or a digit. Host software MUST support this more liberal
syntax.
p...@mail.nsbeta.info writes:
Joseph S D Yao writes:
listman,
why this user has been always staying here for sending spams?
Regards.
Juan O writes:
Heya,how are you doing recently ? I would like to introduce you a very good
company which i knew.Their website is [www.bestseller-offer.com] .
___
14 matches
Mail list logo
