Re: bind Bind or BIND?

2011-01-26 Thread Eivind Olsen
>> Yes, BIND is an acronym for Berkeley Internet Name Daemon. > Berkeley Internet Name Domain. Perhaps you're both right, sort of. http://www.isc.org/software/bind/whatis : The name BIND stands for "Berkeley Internet Name Daemon" Wikipedia also mentions both versions of the name, on http://en.wi

Re: Remove my mail id from list

2011-01-26 Thread pyh
R Juneja writes: Hi , Please remove my mail ID from the list. Unsubscribe yourself from here: https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-use

Remove my mail id from list

2011-01-26 Thread R Juneja
Hi , Please remove my mail ID from the list. Thanks Rohit Juneja =-=-= Notice: The information contained in this e-mail message and/or attachments to it may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use, review

Re: rndc confusion

2011-01-26 Thread Alan Clegg
On 1/26/2011 10:27 PM, donovan jeffrey j wrote: > okay > so what is the rndc.conf for ? -- my finger is on the rm button. > is it for listing other server keys ? rndc.conf is used by rndc in the circumstances that you have put the required "controls" section into your named.conf directly (where t

Re: rndc confusion

2011-01-26 Thread donovan jeffrey j
On Jan 26, 2011, at 9:50 PM, Alan Clegg wrote: > On 1/26/2011 9:39 PM, donovan jeffrey j wrote: > >> I had some issue with an invalid key so i ran rndc-confgen -a which >> gave me a new key in /etc/rndc.key. so now rndc works fine. >> >> but when looked at /etc/rndc.conf the key was different t

Re: rndc confusion

2011-01-26 Thread Alan Clegg
On 1/26/2011 9:39 PM, donovan jeffrey j wrote: > I had some issue with an invalid key so i ran rndc-confgen -a which > gave me a new key in /etc/rndc.key. so now rndc works fine. > > but when looked at /etc/rndc.conf the key was different than the > /etc/rndc.key. i thought they had to be the sam

Re: rndc confusion

2011-01-26 Thread Paul Ooi Cong Jen
On 27-Jan-2011, at 10:39 AM, donovan jeffrey j wrote: > Greetings > > it has been a while since I have worked with named, and Ive seemed to wrap > myself in a key confusion. > > I had some issue with an invalid key so i ran rndc-confgen -a which gave me a > new key in /etc/rndc.key. > so now

Re: rndc confusion

2011-01-26 Thread pyh
The keyname and keyvalue in named.conf, rndc.key and rndc.conf have to be the same. For me I don't have the rndc.key file,but have the left two. Surely the keyname/keyvalue in these files should be the same. Regards. donovan jeffrey j writes: Greetings it has been a while since I have wor

Re: bind Bind or BIND?

2011-01-26 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <20110127020201.861a52d...@mail.nsbeta.info>, p...@mail.nsbeta.info writes: > > When talk to others, I never describe it clearly for naming bind. > is it "bind" or "Bind" or "BIND"? is bind an abbreviation word? BIND stands for Berkley Internet Name Domain. > Thanks. > ___

Re: bind Bind or BIND?

2011-01-26 Thread Alan Clegg
On 1/26/2011 9:22 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote: > On Jan 26, 2011, at 6:02 PM, p...@mail.nsbeta.info wrote: >> When talk to others, I never describe it clearly for naming bind. >> is it "bind" or "Bind" or "BIND"? is bind an abbreviation word? > > Yes, BIND is an acronym for Berkeley Internet Name Daem

rndc confusion

2011-01-26 Thread donovan jeffrey j
Greetings it has been a while since I have worked with named, and Ive seemed to wrap myself in a key confusion. I had some issue with an invalid key so i ran rndc-confgen -a which gave me a new key in /etc/rndc.key. so now rndc works fine. but when looked at /etc/rndc.conf the key was differen

Re: bind Bind or BIND?

2011-01-26 Thread pyh
Mark Andrews writes: In message <20110127020201.861a52d...@mail.nsbeta.info>, p...@mail.nsbeta.info writes: When talk to others, I never describe it clearly for naming bind. is it "bind" or "Bind" or "BIND"? is bind an abbreviation word? BIND stands for Berkley Internet Name Domai

Re: bind Bind or BIND?

2011-01-26 Thread Chuck Swiger
On Jan 26, 2011, at 6:02 PM, p...@mail.nsbeta.info wrote: > When talk to others, I never describe it clearly for naming bind. > is it "bind" or "Bind" or "BIND"? is bind an abbreviation word? Yes, BIND is an acronym for Berkeley Internet Name Daemon. Regards, -- -Chuck

bind Bind or BIND?

2011-01-26 Thread pyh
When talk to others, I never describe it clearly for naming bind. is it "bind" or "Bind" or "BIND"? is bind an abbreviation word? Thanks. ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: root hints

2011-01-26 Thread pyh
Chris Thompson writes: The relevant CHANGES file entry for BIND 9 would seem to be 701. [func] Root hints are now fully optional. Class IN views use compiled-in hints by default, as before. Non-IN views with no root hints now provide authoritative

Re: dns best practices

2011-01-26 Thread Kevin Darcy
The document is a little sloppy. In addition to the mis-description of the DNS resolver algorithm, already noted in a previous post, the part in Section 8.1.2 about restricting zone transfers -- "These restrictions address [...] potential exploits from unrestricted dissemination of information

Re: NS Cache

2011-01-26 Thread Kevin Darcy
On 1/25/2011 9:40 PM, p...@mail.nsbeta.info wrote: I'm reading the document "Secure DNS Deployment Guide" got from the URL a poster gave in the list. The document said: When a user types the URL www.example.com into a Web browser, the browser program contacts a type of resolver called a stub

Re: root hints

2011-01-26 Thread Chris Thompson
On Jan 26 2011, Joseph S D Yao wrote: On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:20:18AM +0800, p...@mail.nsbeta.info wrote: Hello, From what version of bind we won't include the root hints file in named.conf? Since the bind server has been including it inherently. I could be wrong, but I think that a

Re: Clarification on CNAME

2011-01-26 Thread Sam Wilson
In article , Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > On 24.01.11 17:13, rams wrote: > > y resolver is returning multiple CNAMEs for same hostname. But I believe > > CNAME should not return same hostname with multiple values. > > correct. > > > Is this behavior is correct. Could you please clarify me.

Re: Globally setting TTL

2011-01-26 Thread Paul Ooi Cong Jen
On 26-Jan-2011, at 5:21 PM, Torinthiel wrote: > Dnia 2011-01-26 00:21 Eivind Olsen napisał(a): > >>> Is it possible to globally set (override) the default TTL for all zones >>> and their subsequent records? >> >> You're thinking about the authoritative zones you host? I am not aware of >> any s

Re: Forward using CNAME record

2011-01-26 Thread Gary Wallis
p...@mail.nsbeta.info wrote: Gary Wallis writes: Do not confuse your "forwarding" with HTTP rewriting. One is just about DNS records (CNAME, A or otherwise.) The other happens on the server side (see Apache rewrite engine docs.) This is nothing about rewrite, but webserver's virtual host st

Re: root hints

2011-01-26 Thread Rodney Joffe
Tried both numbers. I'm available 602-418-6471. On Jan 26, 2011, at 6:49 AM, Mark Andrews wrote: > > In message <20110126003702.c16...@gwyn.tux.org>, Joseph S D Yao writes: >> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:20:18AM +0800, p...@mail.nsbeta.info wrote: >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> From what version

Re: root hints

2011-01-26 Thread Rodney Joffe
Please excuse my prior noise. Fat finger and head replied to wrong email. But feel free to call if you feel the need ;-) On Jan 26, 2011, at 6:49 AM, Mark Andrews wrote: > > In message <20110126003702.c16...@gwyn.tux.org>, Joseph S D Yao writes: >> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:20:18AM +0800, p

Re: root hints

2011-01-26 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <20110126003702.c16...@gwyn.tux.org>, Joseph S D Yao writes: > On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:20:18AM +0800, p...@mail.nsbeta.info wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > From what version of bind we won't include the root hints file in > > named.conf? Since the bind server has been including it

Re: Forward using CNAME record

2011-01-26 Thread Henry Hartley
On 01/25/2011 01:34 PM, Henry Hartley wrote: On 1/25/2011 10:40 AM, Torinthiel wrote: Dnia 2011-01-25 10:18 Henry Hartley napisał(a): Should I be able to do what I'm trying to do? If you have a web panel to configure your hosting, look for something named alternative domain names, aliases, v

Re: Globally setting TTL

2011-01-26 Thread Torinthiel
Dnia 2011-01-26 00:21 Eivind Olsen napisał(a): >> Is it possible to globally set (override) the default TTL for all zones >> and their subsequent records? > >You're thinking about the authoritative zones you host? I am not aware of >any such setting, but it might be possible to use $INCLUDE in th

Re: DNSSEC auto-dnssec issue bind-9.7.2-P3

2011-01-26 Thread Kalman Feher
On 25/01/11 11:20 PM, "Mark Andrews" wrote: > > In message , Kalman Feher > write > s: >> >> >> >> On 25/01/11 4:10 PM, "Alan Clegg" wrote: >> >>> On 1/25/2011 9:51 AM, Kalman Feher wrote: >>> If the nsec3param has been removed, the automated signing will be weird if you are u

Re: failed multi-view zone transfer

2011-01-26 Thread Niall O'Reilly
On 22 Jan 2011, at 18:29, jeffreyp wrote: > it's the transfers that are not happening. and, specifically, just the > transfers of the internal view to the slave on the different subnet. You've mentioned that the slave receives and logs the NOTIFY. Do you see it (trying to) star

Re: root hints

2011-01-26 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 26.01.11 11:20, p...@mail.nsbeta.info wrote: > From what version of bind we won't include the root hints file in > named.conf? Since the bind server has been including it inherently. Why won't you include root hints file in named.conf? While named has builtin default, you can always includep