Re: service if s/up/down/g ipv6

In message <1295764581.4363.93.camel@localhost.localdomain>, "fakessh @" writes : > hello > > I tried to make a simple box ipv6 r13151.ovh.net did not I know about > registration . my domain names such fakessh.eu owns a recording > well.=20 You just add records like you would A rec

Re: service if s/up/down/g ipv6

hello I tried to make a simple box ipv6 r13151.ovh.net did not I know about registration . my domain names such fakessh.eu owns a recording well. how to properly configure a zone ipv6 thanks Le dimanche 23 janvier 2011 à 03:41 +0100, Eivind Olsen a écrit : > > administrators bind. How

Re: service if s/up/down/g ipv6

> administrators bind. How is it necessary to have a secondary dns server > ipv6 in to establish a connection ipv6. I like ipv6 me and one of > someone else yet I can not properly establish connections ipv6 I do not > even know if I r13151.ovh.net answer properly in ipv6 I'm not 100% sure I under

Re: service if s/up/down/g ipv6

In message <1295741593.4363.79.camel@localhost.localdomain>, "fakessh @" writes : > hello > administrators bind. How is it necessary to have a secondary dns server > ipv6 in to establish a connection ipv6. I like ipv6 me and one of > someone else yet I can not properly establish connections ipv6

service if s/up/down/g ipv6

hello administrators bind. How is it necessary to have a secondary dns server ipv6 in to establish a connection ipv6. I like ipv6 me and one of someone else yet I can not properly establish connections ipv6 I do not even know if I r13151.ovh.net answer properly in ipv6 sincerely -- gpg --keyse

Re: BIND 9.8.0b1 Released Today

At Sat, 22 Jan 2011 20:38:46 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > >> Does this work with DNSSEC if one loads an explicit trust anchor, even > >> if in the "world view" the trust anchor is missing? > > > > I'm afraid I don't understand the question. Could you be more > > specific, e.g., by using the ab

Re: BIND 9.8.0b1 Released Today

* JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉: > Paul Wouters wrote: >> Does this work with DNSSEC if one loads an explicit trust anchor, even >> if in the "world view" the trust anchor is missing? > > I'm afraid I don't understand the question. Could you be more > specific, e.g., by using the above example.com examp

Re: failed multi-view zone transfer

thanks chris. sorry if i've confused anyone. the notifications appear to be working fine. i enabled notify logging on the slaves and do see the notifications at the slaves, as expected. it's the transfers that are not happening. and, specifically, just the transfers of the internal view to

Question about recursion logging

Hi, I have a Bind 9 recursive only server on Window. Is there any way I could configure Bind to write to the logs exactly what root server is being queried for a client request? I enabled query logging and resolver logging but there is no info about which server is being queried exactly. Thank yo

Re: failed multi-view zone transfer

Notifications by default do not go to the server listed in the mname field of the SOA record, so that the primary master does not notify itself. If you put the actual primary master's name in the mname, does it work correctly? You saud that also-notify lists the slaves. This should ensure that bo