hello bind network and hello dnssec network admin.
thank you for answered,
I think I found a solution to my problem.
$INCLUDE directive is that I have to handle
example:
$INCLUDE /var/named/keys/dsset-fakessh.eu. fakessh.eu
$INCLUDE /var/named/keys/keyset-fakessh.eu. fakessh
Hi Stewart.
> SLAVE (10.5.0.6)
> transfer-source 10.5.0.5;
>
> zone "bard.edu" {
> masters { 10.5.0.5; };
> transfer-source 10.5.0.5;
transfer-source should probably be 10.5.0.6, not .5
> Jan 13 12:37:37 nsi1 named[21007]: zone bard.edu/IN
On 1/11/2011 11:40 PM, p...@mail.nsbeta.info wrote:
These triggered the release of 9.7.2-P1
when we were rejecting these after tightening the response processing
to treat glue to answer responses as referrals to address the issue
of named return glue records from the parent zones rather than the
IN the past I've had separate internal and external, master and slave servers.
Moving from AIX to Lnx/VMware, I'm doing one master (with internal and external
views) and one slave. When the slave's copy ages out, it seems to successfully
pulls new zone files from the master.
But when I update
On Jan 13, 2011, at 12:08 PM, Barry Finkel wrote:
I am running bind-9.7.2-P3, and I am having a problem with BIND or
the network or the Ubuntu operating system. I send a DNS query from
one of my DNS servers to another of my DNS servers. I see in a tshark
trace that the reply packet is receive
On Thu, 13 Jan 2011, fakessh @ wrote:
> I correctly configure my server centos dnssec on with as a
> representative of encryptions dlv isc. my question is relevant and was
> already asked but I have not found the complete answer on google. my
> question is how to include the DS record in the Keys.
I am running bind-9.7.2-P3, and I am having a problem with BIND or
the network or the Ubuntu operating system. I send a DNS query from
one of my DNS servers to another of my DNS servers. I see in a tshark
trace that the reply packet is received back at the querying server, but
dig produces a tim
heh. sorry. i did read dig's man page but i thought you
were going to reply and tell me my dig version was behind
yours.
sorry for the tardy reply. one of those weeks.
j.
ns5 52 > dig @146.6.211.1 +tcp arlut.utexas.edu
; <<>> DiG 9.3.6-P1-RedHat-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_5.3 <<>> @146.6.211.1 +tcp
a
On 1/13/2011 11:08 AM, Peter Andreev wrote:
> I've executed
> rndc addzone test.test '{ type master; file "/etc/namedb/master/test.1"; };'
>
> and have got the file /etc/namedb/3bf305731dd26307.nzf:
> zone test.test { type master; file "/etc/namedb/master/test.1"; };
>
> The question was: can I
I see that my first post wasn't clear, please, excuse me.
I'll try to explain the situation.
I have:
named.conf:
...
include "includes/file1";
include "includes/file2";
etc
...
eof
I've executed
rndc addzone test.test '{ type master; file "/etc/namedb/master/test.1"; };'
and have got the file /
On 1/13/2011 9:43 AM, Peter Andreev wrote:
> I have several includes which are edited via hand-written script and
> now I'm trying to simplify it by using add/delzone options of rndc.
Yay!
> So, the question is: how can I specify files where rndc addzone puts
> new zones' descriptions?
You prov
Hi,
http://www.google.com/search?q=rndc+addzone
1st link : rndc addzone example.aa in myview '{type master; file
"master/example.aa";};'
Not tested.
2011/1/13 Peter Andreev :
> Hello, All!
>
> I have several includes which are edited via hand-written script and
> now I'm trying to simplify it
Hello, All!
I have several includes which are edited via hand-written script and
now I'm trying to simplify it by using add/delzone options of rndc.
So, the question is: how can I specify files where rndc addzone puts
new zones' descriptions?
Thanks in advance.
--
--
AP
On 1/13/2011 9:19 AM, hugo hugoo wrote:
> For all users...
>
> Can anybody give me informations on the IPV6 compatibility of BIND9
> compared to BIND8?
> It is not clear what is present in BIND9 and not in BIN8 regarding IPV6.
>
> I have created an IPV6 record in BIND8 and it works...
>
> Tha
For all users...
Can anybody give me informations on the IPV6 compatibility of BIND9 compared to
BIND8?
It is not clear what is present in BIND9 and not in BIN8 regarding IPV6.
I have created an IPV6 record in BIND8 and it works...
Thanks in advance for any clear references or for any clear
15 matches
Mail list logo