Bind not returning A record

2010-12-21 Thread Paul Ooi Cong Jen
Hi All, I am having problem with Bind query, but not sure is it client error or server error. Below is the server details. Server running FreeBSD 8.1 Bind 9.7.0-P3 options { query-source address * port *; use-v4-udp-ports { range 2048 65535; }; recursive-clients 20

Re: named: high memory usage under FreeBSD-7...?

2010-12-21 Thread Chuck Swiger
On Dec 21, 2010, at 4:34 PM, Doug Barton wrote: > You're combining too many variables. Whilst on the same platform (presumably > FreeBSD 7) install dns/bind94, run your tests. Then deinstall that, and > install dns/bind96; then run your tests. > > I suspect that what you're seeing is actually a

Re: named: high memory usage under FreeBSD-7...?

2010-12-21 Thread Doug Barton
You're combining too many variables. Whilst on the same platform (presumably FreeBSD 7) install dns/bind94, run your tests. Then deinstall that, and install dns/bind96; then run your tests. I suspect that what you're seeing is actually a problem in BIND 9.4, irrespective of platform. The metho

Re: named: high memory usage under FreeBSD-7...?

2010-12-21 Thread Chuck Swiger
Hi, Dough-- On Dec 21, 2010, at 2:22 PM, Doug Barton wrote: > On 12/16/2010 14:48, Chuck Swiger wrote: >> Hi, bind-users-- >> >> I'd recently updated a machine to FreeBSD 7-STABLE, and I've noticed >> that named from the base system (which claims to be BIND 9.4-ESV-R4) >> is using more than twice

Re: DDNS fails. record allready exists

2010-12-21 Thread Bill Larson
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 1:34 PM, wrote: > Hi List, > I have not yet found a solution for my problem. So I came here: > > I use DDNS. Every night my server (in my local network) is shutting down. > On > the next day I have the problem that DDNS is no longer working, because on > update I get the e

Re: named: high memory usage under FreeBSD-7...?

2010-12-21 Thread Doug Barton
On 12/16/2010 14:48, Chuck Swiger wrote: Hi, bind-users-- I'd recently updated a machine to FreeBSD 7-STABLE, and I've noticed that named from the base system (which claims to be BIND 9.4-ESV-R4) is using more than twice as much memory as it used to: Hey Chuck, sorry I didn't respond to this o

Re: DDNS fails. record allready exists

2010-12-21 Thread Tym Rehm
Are you getting any error messages in the logs? If so, please post logs. What OS are you running? What does your named.conf file look like? On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > On 20.12.10 21:34, magic-b...@damage.devloop.de wrote: > > I have not yet found a solution f

Re: Wrong names for NS and glue records not in the child zone

2010-12-21 Thread Kalman Feher
On 20/12/10 4:18 PM, "Laurent Bauer" wrote: > On 20/12/2010 13:50, Kalman Feher wrote: >>> The registry NS return an authority section like : domain.tld. IN NS ns1.domain.tld. domain.tld. IN NS ns2.domain.tld. and an additional section with these glue records. The