Re: hello bind network problem ipv6

2010-12-11 Thread Byung-Hee HWANG
"fakessh @" 쓰시길: > please you have to be in your answer or (...) Never use "IP6.INT"! -- 소여물 황병희(黃炳熙) | .. 출항 15분전.. "Consult the best lawyers on criminal law." -- Vito Corleone, "Chapter 20", page 296 pgpx5kH5MbhAQ.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: different DNS Cache get different records

2010-12-11 Thread Barry Margolin
In article , Jorg W Young wrote: > Hello, > > One of our records, s3.xxfy.duowan.com, has been meeting the resolving > problem. > The different dns cache will get different result for the resolving. > > for example, > > $ dig s3.xxfy.duowan.com @202.96.128.166 +short > s3-duowan.xxfy.kunlun.

Re: Almost Ready for DNS-SEC but Slightly Confused in Home Stretch

2010-12-11 Thread Michael Sinatra
On 12/10/10 08:17, Martin McCormick wrote: As a reminder, none of this is on our master DNS yet so we are still doing the normal activities. Our firewalls are supposed to be adjusted to allow the 4096-byte DNS packets in the next day or so so all the testing is being done on another box

different DNS Cache get different records

2010-12-11 Thread Jorg W Young
Hello, One of our records, s3.xxfy.duowan.com, has been meeting the resolving problem. The different dns cache will get different result for the resolving. for example, $ dig s3.xxfy.duowan.com @202.96.128.166 +short s3-duowan.xxfy.kunlun.com. 60.28.208.177 $ dig s3.xxfy.duowan.com @8.8.8.8 +sh