aa> Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 15:04:23 -0500
> From: Martin McCormick
> Sender: bind-users-bounces+oberman=es@lists.isc.org
>
> This sounds like a firewall issue, but read carefully.
>
> Our master and slave are on 2 different networks that
> are each larger than a single octet. Bot
This sounds like a firewall issue, but read carefully.
Our master and slave are on 2 different networks that
are each larger than a single octet. Both are producing messages
like:
client 139.78.100.57#33486: error sending response: host unreachable
That particular VLAN or
Jiann-Ming Su wrote:
>> On Nov 4, 2010, at 8:38 PM, Jiann-Ming Su wrote:
>>> So, to clarify my question. When I add the other two dhcp servers
>>> to the masters{} list and set "multi-master yes" will this allow
>>> all three dhcp servers to update the dyn.mydomain.com zone? If so,
>>> do the
On 11/04/2010 06:43 PM, Alan Clegg wrote:
On 11/4/2010 12:22 AM, Alans wrote:
On 10/31/2010 4:48 AM, Alans wrote:
Have 2 questions, is there any limitation (beside hardware) on number of
views? I mean creating a view/customer?
And is there any limitation for number of zones/view?
Since I didn'
> On Nov 4, 2010, at 8:38 PM, Jiann-Ming Su wrote:
> > So, to clarify my question. When I add the other two dhcp servers to the
> > masters{} list and set "multi-master yes" will this allow all three dhcp
>servers
>
> > to update the dyn.mydomain.com zone? If so, do the three dhcp servers
Chris. Thanks for the confirmation. Just wanted to make sure I did not
miss something.
Yes. You suggestion would work. But, I will leave things as is. It's
straight forward and easy for someone else to follow.
Thanks again,
Mike.
Michael D. Cavanagh
Phone [916] 853-9658
___
Paul Ebersman writes:
> category edns-disabled { null; };
>
> should make you happier.
I must get a newer edition of DNS and Bind, but thanks
to you and the list for your patience.
Actually, I am not sure whether it is mentioned in the
4TH edition but searching for something
martin> there is a recurring message in named.log that goes something
martin> like:
martin> success resolving 'www.pbs.org/A' (in 'pbs.org'?) after
martin> reducing the advertised EDNS UDP packet size to 512 octets
martin> What category of message is this called and can I put something
martin>
Op 05/11/2010 om 09:31:58 -0500, schreef Martin McCormick:
> We just started running bind9.7.1 in production mode and
> it appears to be healthy but there is a recurring message in
> named.log that goes something like:
>
> success resolving '147.184.158.95.in-addr.arpa/PTR'
> (in '95.in-add
We just started running bind9.7.1 in production mode and
it appears to be healthy but there is a recurring message in
named.log that goes something like:
success resolving '147.184.158.95.in-addr.arpa/PTR'
(in '95.in-addr.arpa'?) after reducing the advertised EDNS UDP packet size to
512
On Fri, 5 Nov 2010, Marc Lampo wrote:
>
> in RFC5011, section 6.6, "Trust Point Deletion" (== KSK rollover),
Trust point deletion isn't the same as a normal KSK rollover. It's a
special procedure to make validators remove a trust anchor while
maintaining the security status of the zone using a cha
Hello,
in RFC5011, section 6.6, "Trust Point Deletion" (== KSK rollover),
there is an unconditional statement to set the REVOKE bit on the "old" KSK,
once the parent zone publishes the DS record of the new KSK.
I / we at EURId / are interested to learn if this unconditional setting of the
revo
12 matches
Mail list logo
