Re: named-checkzone Test Runs

2010-10-13 Thread Martin McCormick
For the sake of thoroughness, the -j flag causes named-compilezone to also look at the .jnl files so that the zone you getis as up to date as possible. Martin ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bin

Re: named-checkzone Test Runs

2010-10-13 Thread Martin McCormick
A list member wrote: > named-checkzone doesn't need to read the named.conf file - it just makes > sure that the zone is correct. if you want to check named.conf, you will > need to use named-checkconf > > For checking config, try > > named-checkconf -t [chroot directory] [relative path to name

RE: named-checkzone Test Runs

2010-10-13 Thread Lightner, Jeff
Can you share what you're talking about since it appears you're saying you got the reply off list? -Original Message- From: bind-users-bounces+jlightner=water@lists.isc.org [mailto:bind-users-bounces+jlightner=water@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Martin McCormick Sent: Wednesday, Octo

Re: named-checkzone Test Runs

2010-10-13 Thread Martin McCormick
I wrote: > I am testing bind9.7 and seem to not be correctly defining the > path to the localhost forward and reverse zones which are in > /var/named/etc/namedb/master. After the chroot, they should be > found by a path of named/etc/namedb/master but so far nothing > seems to work. My than

Re: Bind and blacklist IP file

2010-10-13 Thread Michael Sinatra
On 10/13/10 03:24, Andrey G. Sergeev wrote: Hello David, Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:38:24 -0400 David Miller wrote: On 10/11/2010 3:26 PM, Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris) wrote: Hello Alans, Mon, 11 Oct 2010 20:07:40 +0300 Alans wrote: Why not? OpenDNS is a good example i think. Good example

named-checkzone Test Runs

2010-10-13 Thread Martin McCormick
I am testing bind9.7 and seem to not be correctly defining the path to the localhost forward and reverse zones which are in /var/named/etc/namedb/master. After the chroot, they should be found by a path of named/etc/namedb/master but so far nothing seems to work. I have read the ma

Re: Integrating BIND9 with external graphing like Cacti

2010-10-13 Thread Phil Mayers
On 13/10/10 15:16, Eivind Olsen wrote: Has anyone here made use of the XML statistics interface in BIND9, to get some numbers into Cacti (or another similar tool)? If so, how, and which numbers did you feel were worth turning into graphs? Yes. We have a system where local scripts on our machin

Re: GSS-TSIG and Active Directory

2010-10-13 Thread Nicholas F Miller
Second try: > Is there a bug in the implementation of the update-policy or do I not have a grasp on how it should work? If wanted to only allow machines in an Active Directory the ability to update their 'A' records shouldn't I be able to use a statement like this: update-policy {

Integrating BIND9 with external graphing like Cacti

2010-10-13 Thread Eivind Olsen
Has anyone here made use of the XML statistics interface in BIND9, to get some numbers into Cacti (or another similar tool)? If so, how, and which numbers did you feel were worth turning into graphs? Regards Eivind Olsen ___ bind-users mailing list bin

Re: Using one key to sign multiple zones (aka key sharing)

2010-10-13 Thread Mark Andrews
Named is written such that each DNSKEY has its own key files. This stores meta data about the DNSKEY. There is nothing to prevent on extracting the RSA key pair and re-using it for a differnet DNSKEY. We just don't have a tool to do this. If you are using a HSM then using dnssec-keyfromlabel mu

Re: Bind and blacklist IP file

2010-10-13 Thread Kalman Feher
On 13/10/10 12:13 PM, "Andrey G. Sergeev" wrote: > Hello Alans, > > > Tue, 12 Oct 2010 16:52:15 +0300 Alans wrote: > >> On 10/12/2010 03:44 PM, Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris) wrote: >>> Hello Ian, >>> >>> >>> Tue, 12 Oct 2010 10:54:19 +0100 "Ian Tait" wrote: >>> > Ok, but you can alw

Using one key to sign multiple zones (aka key sharing)

2010-10-13 Thread Tim Verhoeven
Hello, I've tried to sign multiple zones using the same key. But it seems that currently Bind does not allow this. Is this a omission or by design ? I know OpenDNSSEC can do this, and IIRC there is nothing in the RFC's that disallow key sharing. Regards, Tim -- Tim Verhoeven - tim.verhoeven...@

Re: Bind and blacklist IP file

2010-10-13 Thread Andrey G. Sergeev
Hello David, Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:38:24 -0400 David Miller wrote: > On 10/11/2010 3:26 PM, Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris) wrote: >> Hello Alans, >> >> >> Mon, 11 Oct 2010 20:07:40 +0300 Alans wrote: >> >>> Why not? OpenDNS is a good example i think. >> Good example? Was it a joke? Do the tracer

Re: Bind and blacklist IP file

2010-10-13 Thread Andrey G. Sergeev
Hello Alans, Tue, 12 Oct 2010 16:52:15 +0300 Alans wrote: > On 10/12/2010 03:44 PM, Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris) wrote: >> Hello Ian, >> >> >> Tue, 12 Oct 2010 10:54:19 +0100 "Ian Tait" wrote: >> Ok, but you can always browse by IP address and in this case there is no DNS server than