Michael,
Do you have a standard template that you use for your Cisco firewall
devices?
Or are you just disabling the fixup protocol's?
Jerry
On 07/24/10 15:16, Michael Sinatra wrote:
That's true, but it doesn't quite explain why the "DNS Inspection
Policy," turned on by default on the PI
It makes it really hard to follow the thread.
> Why not?
> > Please don't top post!
> From: "Laws, Peter C."
> Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 16:56:26 +
> Sender: bind-users-bounces+oberman=es@lists.isc.org
>
> Well aware of that, but we have RedHat support so we're stuck with
> that given that
> From: Warren Kumari
> Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 11:22:46 +0200
> Sender: bind-users-bounces+oberman=es@lists.isc.org
>
>
> On Jul 25, 2010, at 4:33 AM, Danny Mayer wrote:
>
> > On 7/24/2010 5:10 AM, Warren Kumari wrote:
> >>
> >> On Jul 23, 2010, at 2:37 PM, Danny Mayer wrote:
> >>
> >>> O
Well aware of that, but we have RedHat support so we're stuck with that given
that the alternatives are self-supporting BIND (which you could argue I'm doing
right now!) or going with a 3rd party. Given the economy, I'm pleased we're
keeping RH support.
--
Peter Laws / N5UWY
National Weather C
Understood, but what I'm asking about is that the slave does not appear to be
losing contact with the first-listed master. In fact, from the logs, it
appears to be flipping back and forth (though not round-robinning).
Someone else asked, essentially, "why?" ... The network paths are diverse
On Jul 25, 2010, at 4:33 AM, Danny Mayer wrote:
> On 7/24/2010 5:10 AM, Warren Kumari wrote:
>>
>> On Jul 23, 2010, at 2:37 PM, Danny Mayer wrote:
>>
>>> On 7/22/2010 11:08 PM, Merton Campbell Crockett wrote:
Thanks for the confirmation that the problem was related to DNSSEC.
I
6 matches
Mail list logo
