Re: FW: BIND 9 errors

2010-06-30 Thread Peter Andreev
2010/7/1 Y z > > (bind version 9.7.0-P1) > > A DNS slave server has two IPs: an internal RFC1918 number to talk to > the internal net, and an external one to talk to the rest of the world. > > If I *don't* put the external IP in a master: > > zone "example.com" { > type slave; > file "example"; >

FW: BIND 9 errors

2010-06-30 Thread Y z
(bind version 9.7.0-P1) A DNS slave server has two IPs: an internal RFC1918 number to talk to the internal net, and an external one to talk to the rest of the world. If I *don't* put the external IP in a master: zone "example.com" { type slave; file "example"; masters port 1053 { 172.16.0.30; }

Re: bind dlz(mysql)

2010-06-30 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <201007011210381811...@114.com.cn>, "ShanyiWan" writes: > SOA Record query : > > 01-Jul-2010 12:00:09.121 dns_rdata_fromtext: buffer-0xbff9b414:1: near '20100 > 701000': out of range > 01-Jul-2010 12:00:09.121 dns_sdlz_putrr returned error. Error code was: out o > f range > What is the

bind dlz(mysql)

2010-06-30 Thread ShanyiWan
SOA Record query : 01-Jul-2010 12:00:09.121 dns_rdata_fromtext: buffer-0xbff9b414:1: near '20100701000': out of range 01-Jul-2010 12:00:09.121 dns_sdlz_putrr returned error. Error code was: out of range What is the scope of the serial field values? and data fields(table:dns_records) cannot be

Re: negative caching and TTL

2010-06-30 Thread Mark Andrews
In message , aldu s jung writes: > Hi, I am hoping to learn more about how BIND v 9.7.0 implements negative > caching of > delegated subdomains. I've tested and found that BIND observes a different > TTL for > name errors than I would expect it to abide by, but that could be my lack > of understa

Re: Bind-9.7.1 multi thread question (FreeBSD)

2010-06-30 Thread Doug Barton
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010, Bind wrote: Hello I compiled Bind971 on FreeBSD 8 (amd64). FYI, you may get better results by using /usr/ports/dns/bind97.

Bind-9.7.1 multi thread question (FreeBSD)

2010-06-30 Thread Bind
Hello I compiled Bind971 on FreeBSD 8 (amd64). ./configure --prefix=/opt/ --enable-threads --sysconfdir=/opt/config --localstatedir=/opt/ --sbindir=/opt/named --datarootdir=/opt/ --enable-shared=no --with-openssl everything is ok and it works. but when i get top command,,freebsd returns many na

negative caching and TTL

2010-06-30 Thread aldus jung
Hi, I am hoping to learn more about how BIND v 9.7.0 implements negative caching of delegated subdomains. I've tested and found that BIND observes a different TTL for name errors than I would expect it to abide by, but that could be my lack of understanding of what TTL a DNS server is supposed to

Re: Nsupdate -l not using session.key

2010-06-30 Thread Kalman Feher
On 30/06/10 5:25 PM, "Alan Clegg" wrote: > On 6/30/2010 11:13 AM, Kalman Feher wrote: >> While testing bind 9.7.1 features including automated signing and >> update-policy local. I encountered some strange behaviour using nsupdate -l. >> >> When using nsupdate -l I was not able to update the

Re: Nsupdate -l not using session.key

2010-06-30 Thread Alan Clegg
On 6/30/2010 11:13 AM, Kalman Feher wrote: > While testing bind 9.7.1 features including automated signing and > update-policy local. I encountered some strange behaviour using nsupdate -l. > > When using nsupdate -l I was not able to update the zone in question and the > following error was gener

Nsupdate -l not using session.key

2010-06-30 Thread Kalman Feher
While testing bind 9.7.1 features including automated signing and update-policy local. I encountered some strange behaviour using nsupdate -l. When using nsupdate -l I was not able to update the zone in question and the following error was generated: update-security: error: client 127.0.0.1#9292: