Re: Bind9 logging options

The DNS Servers are authoritive. I have more than 100 users for them, and the number of queries performed per minute is very high due to the nature of our organization. Moreover, I do not have a specific time window in which the timeouts occur, so, it is impossible to run it 24/7! From your answ

Re: How to prevent slaves from contacting master for name resolution?

On May 17, 2010, at 7:24 PM, Kevin Darcy wrote: > On 5/17/2010 5:58 PM, Keith Christian wrote: >> Our redundant DNS configuration is one master and three slaves, spread >> across two colo facilities. >> >> master and slave1 are in colo_ALPHA. >> slave2 and slave3 are in colo_BETA. >> >> During an

Re: How to prevent slaves from contacting master for name resolution?

On 5/17/2010 5:58 PM, Keith Christian wrote: Our redundant DNS configuration is one master and three slaves, spread across two colo facilities. master and slave1 are in colo_ALPHA. slave2 and slave3 are in colo_BETA. During an extended maintenance window, the master DNS was offline. Slave2 was

Re: Multi-mastering with dynamic updates

On 5/17/2010 4:13 PM, Linux Addict wrote: On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Phil Mayers > wrote: On 17/05/10 16:59, Arcan_- wrote: Thanks for the reply. Interesting. What's the use-case for this? I have a few hundreds of dhcp

How to prevent slaves from contacting master for name resolution?

Our redundant DNS configuration is one master and three slaves, spread across two colo facilities. master and slave1 are in colo_ALPHA. slave2 and slave3 are in colo_BETA. During an extended maintenance window, the master DNS was offline. Slave2 was trying to contact the master, and lookups faile

Re: Multi-mastering with dynamic updates

On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Phil Mayers wrote: > On 17/05/10 16:59, Arcan_- wrote: > >> Thanks for the reply. >> >> Interesting. What's the use-case for this? >>> >> >> I have a few hundreds of dhcp clients and a two nodes pseudo cluster (for >> the VIP). >> I need a solution that enable hi

Re: Multi-mastering with dynamic updates

On 17/05/10 16:59, Arcan_- wrote: Thanks for the reply. Interesting. What's the use-case for this? I have a few hundreds of dhcp clients and a two nodes pseudo cluster (for the VIP). I need a solution that enable high availability on the same level of service. That way, if one node fails, t

Re: Multi-mastering with dynamic updates

Phil Mayers wrote: On 17/05/10 16:02, arcan...@free.fr wrote: Hi all, Like a lot of people over the web, I am looking for a clean multi-master (multi-primary) solution that allow dynamic updates. Interesting. What's the use-case for this? From my personal experience the most common use of

Re: Multi-mastering with dynamic updates

Thanks for the reply. > Interesting. What's the use-case for this? I have a few hundreds of dhcp clients and a two nodes pseudo cluster (for the VIP). I need a solution that enable high availability on the same level of service. That way, if one node fails, the other can fully take over. > You

Re: Multi-mastering with dynamic updates

On 17/05/10 16:02, arcan...@free.fr wrote: Hi all, Like a lot of people over the web, I am looking for a clean multi-master (multi-primary) solution that allow dynamic updates. Interesting. What's the use-case for this? And like a lot of people over the web, I haven't found anything intere

Help for a Windows installation

Hi, I'm trying to install the last version of Bind in a standalone Windows 2003 Server. I would set a caching-only nameserver, but I'm not so expert. I would: - limit who can use this nameserver - log the failed queries - delete the cache if necessary How should I fill in these files? Thanks! A

Multi-mastering with dynamic updates

Hi all, Like a lot of people over the web, I am looking for a clean multi-master (multi-primary) solution that allow dynamic updates. And like a lot of people over the web, I haven't found anything interesting. Google hasn't been friendly for now :/ I have tried : - bind-dlz over brbd doesn't

RE: Bind9 logging options

Are the timed out queries recursive or authoritative? I'd suggest tcpdump running on both the BIND servers and the client, so you can match send/receive and show missed packets directly. Cheers, Todd. -Original Message- From: bind-users-bounces+tsnyder=rim@lists.isc.org [mailto:bind

Bind9 logging options

Hallo, I have a problem in my recursive DNS servers (Bind 9, on RHEL 5). Intalled package on my system is the latest bind-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_4.2 from Red Hat. My problem is that sometimes, queries are failed with timeouts and that the one of my 2 DNS servers (the one set as primaryin my users) has 3