Hi Mark,
>allow-recursion defaults to "{ localnets; localhost; };".
>If the client was not on a directly connected network it
>will NOT get recursion by default.
So it would seem; I had made an assumption about subnetting that apparently was
not entirely accurate. Oh well, you know what they sa
In message <9b2fff1719120e4c83de53c2f70cc60755d5899...@secmclust01a.corp.ssi.go
vt.nz>, James Roberts-Thomson writes:
> Hi Mark,
>
> Thanks for your response; whilst I accept what your saying, I'm not convinced
> it applies in this case.
>
> As far as I can tell, recursion is enabled on the serv
Hi Mark,
Thanks for your response; whilst I accept what your saying, I'm not convinced
it applies in this case.
As far as I can tell, recursion is enabled on the servers. (We don't have an
allow-recursion entry in the named.conf, and my reading of the documentation
implies recursion is enable
In message <9b2fff1719120e4c83de53c2f70cc60755d5899...@secmclust01a.corp.ssi.go
vt.nz>, James Roberts-Thomson writes:
>
> Can anyone explain what may be happening here, please?
Stub resolvers really should be talking to nameservers that offer
recursion. If it is talking to a nameserver that does
Hello,
I have tried to research my problem, but haven't found an answer from the
collected Google wisdom of the ages, unfortunately.
We have a situation where we are getting strange results from the "nslookup"
command (with knock-on effects to name resolution in general).
We have two primary (
In message <20100415204352.3695b40...@britaine.cis.anl.gov>, b19...@anl.gov wri
tes:
> I am trying to understand "format error" messages like this one from
> BIND 9.7.0-P1:
>
> Apr 15 15:36:02 dnsserver.it.anl.gov named[8662]:
>[ID 873579 daemon.notice] DNS format error
>from
> Actually there *is* DNSSEC involved or the query would not have
> failed.
Yes, sorry. I meant to imply that there is no DNSSEC involved beyond
the verification of the covering NSEC that proves the lack of a DLV
record.
> There is a bug in the BIND 9.7.0-P1 fixes that triggers this. The
> fix
In message , Li
nux Addict writes:
>
> Hello Folks, I got a strange issue going on..
>
> I dig for a specific record against a ISP cache server , and the cache
> server doesn't seem to see it, but When I do dig +any, then the record stays
> in the cache for say 5minutes and then vanishes.
>
> an
b19...@anl.gov wrote:
I am trying to understand "format error" messages like this one from
BIND 9.7.0-P1:
Apr 15 15:36:02 dnsserver.it.anl.gov named[8662]:
[ID 873579 daemon.notice] DNS format error
from 209.234.234.42#53 resolving markets.nytimes.wallst.com/
for cl
I am trying to understand "format error" messages like this one from
BIND 9.7.0-P1:
Apr 15 15:36:02 dnsserver.it.anl.gov named[8662]:
[ID 873579 daemon.notice] DNS format error
from 209.234.234.42#53 resolving markets.nytimes.wallst.com/
for client 164.54.214.14#13132
Hello Nuno,
Thursday, April 15, 2010, 9:43:52 AM, you wrote:
> Hi,
> At the first sight it seems network problems, but when you restart bind,
> the problem goes away for a while.
> I suppose your dns server is resolving names for himself, try to put
> your ISP's dns servers on resolv.conf, perha
> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 14:25:35 -0400
> Subject: Re: logging forwarding reqs
> From: Jonathan Reed
> To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
>
> But I am still unable to determine if those reqs are asking the
> forwarders.
>
> The forwarders are all Windows boxes which I dont have rights to
> access. St
Indeed I have setup querylog, and I have these show in my logs:
Apr 15 14:20:00 TOR-HYPER-01 named[10228]: client 172.18.4.214#47149: query:
google.ca IN A +
Apr 15 14:20:09 TOR-HYPER-01 named[10228]: client 172.18.4.214#51366: query:
yahoo.ca IN A +
Apr 15 14:23:32 TOR-HYPER-01 named[10228]: clien
Hello Folks, I got a strange issue going on..
I dig for a specific record against a ISP cache server , and the cache
server doesn't seem to see it, but When I do dig +any, then the record stays
in the cache for say 5minutes and then vanishes.
any idea?
~LA
___
Hi,
At the first sight it seems network problems, but when you restart bind,
the problem goes away for a while.
I suppose your dns server is resolving names for himself, try to put
your ISP's dns servers on resolv.conf, perhaps it solve the problem.
It could be a problem with your dns forwarders b
Hey all,
I've setup bind9 to be a forwarder only. However I'm not understanding how
to confirm requests for queries are being sent through to the forwarded dns
servers. Even running in debug mode, I can see the req, but I dont see
anything in the debug msg that says its been forwarded on to any of
Hello,
Looks like NXDOMAIN can be one of the responses.
http://www.spamhaus.org/faq/answers.lasso?section=DNSBL%20Usage#252
That said, I think it is working correctly (a la
"name=33.229.242.205.zen.spamhaus.org type=A: Host not found, try again").
However, perhaps tweak the number of que
hi all,
i have another problem:when i use sdb mysql as a backup storing
zone data, i found this method doesn't support dynamic update message. but i
need a database backup and dynamic shema. is there any solutions?
thank you very much!
Best regards!
Sincerely,
aiHua Zhang
State Key Lab.
18 matches
Mail list logo
