On 3/8/2010 2:29 PM, Joe User wrote:
Hi, I would like to implement a server for an internal business business unit
to restrict recusion for only domains white listed by IT. Can anyone share a
config for a similar implementation.
Why do you think it's preferable to return a referral, fo
Hi,
For whitelisting a set of domains via their netblocks to allow recursion FROM
them, the allow-recursion statement is your friend. For a filtering setup,
which I think is what you want to achieve, a web proxy is much more suitable.
An internal root would allow you to such things via DNS, but
Hi, I would like to implement a server for an internal business business unit
to restrict recusion for only domains white listed by IT. Can anyone share a
config for a similar implementation.
thanks
Tom
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@l
> Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 10:03:26 -0800
> From: Michael Sinatra
> Sender: bind-users-bounces+oberman=es@lists.isc.org
>
> On 3/7/10 10:46 AM, Danny Mayer wrote:
>
> > Autokey is not a cryptographic signature protocol. It *is* a
> > authentication protocol for the server only and there are a
On 3/7/10 10:46 AM, Danny Mayer wrote:
Autokey is not a cryptographic signature protocol. It *is* a
authentication protocol for the server only and there are a number of
exchanges that need to be done to complete the authentication of the
server. You cannot compare this with DNSSEC and nothing i
Can you provide the domain name and an example of the problem?
That will help in identifying the issue.
On 8/03/10 11:21 AM, "bsd" wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> I am running an important subzone of .museum zone (which implements both
> DNSSec and IDN) and I have a strange behavior going on
>
> Some
Hello,
I am running an important subzone of .museum zone (which implements both DNSSec
and IDN) and I have a strange behavior going on…
Some requests seems not to be resolved correctly with certain operators…
One out of six requests are not resolved correctly.
Instead of giving the answer
7 matches
Mail list logo
