Hi Mark,
Thank you every much for you help. I can solve the problem now.
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 7:52 AM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> In message ,
> Makara writes:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm dns administrator, please give me an excuse if it's not the right
> place
> > to ask the question. My dns server is
In message ,
Makara writes:
> Hi,
>
> I'm dns administrator, please give me an excuse if it's not the right place
> to ask the question. My dns server is attacked, below are the log
You are not being attacked. The zone 26.178.115.in-addr.arpa is
delegated to you but you are not configured to s
Hi,
I'm dns administrator, please give me an excuse if it's not the right place
to ask the question. My dns server is attacked, below are the log
Feb 4 06:26:29 ns01 named[7791]: client 204.194.238.15#42502: query (cache)
'118.26.178.115.in-addr.arpa/PTR/IN' denied
Feb 4 06:26:29 ns01 named[779
BIND 9.6.2 Release Candidate 1 is now available.
BIND 9.6.2rc1 is a maintenance release candidate for BIND 9.6.
BIND 9.6.2rc1 can be downloaded from
ftp://ftp.isc.org/isc/bind9/9.6.2rc1/bind-9.6.2rc1.tar.gz
The PGP signature of the distribution is at
ft
Now filed as bug 561299
Whats the easiest way to upgrade/downgrade bind and bind utils on Fedora and
Centos?
Thanks
Duncan
> -Original Message-
> From: Lightner, Jeff [mailto:jlight...@water.com]
> Sent: 03 February 2010 15:59
> To: Duncan Berriman; bind-users@lists.isc.org
> Subject: R
You might want to file a bug report with RedHat.
I just looked through the notifications I got last year from RedHat
regarding various bug and security updates to the bind packages and none
of them mention this change.
Can others on the list verify the default (non-RedHat) bind-utils
package's ho
Whats odd is FC8,9 and 11 are ok.
10 uses 9.5.1
Centos uses 9.3.6
It appears therefore that Redhat are somehow causing the issue when building
certain versions.
Thanks for your help proving what it is at least I can look at upgrading or
downgrading to solve the issue.
> -Original Message-
Interesting.
On checking a CentOS5 and a RHEL5 system I found I had
bind-utils-9.3.4-10.P1.el5_3.3 and running host with specifying server
did what it should (what you expected).
I then updated the CentOS5 to bind-utils-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_4.2 and now have
the issue you're talking about so it appears
Problem is I am specifying the server on the command line, it is supposed to
use only that server, not randomly decide because it can't connect to that
server to try any others it feels like.
Even the -s option makes no difference.
It should even been looking at files or dns
Duncan
> -O
rpm -qa |grep bind
Will tell you all the BIND packages you have installed via RPM.
The reason commands check resolv.conf in UNIX/Linux is typically due to
how you've setup /etc/nsswitch.conf. A line is contained in it similar
to the following:
hosts: files dns
The above line says to first
# rpm -q -f `which host`
bind-utils-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_4.2
Thanks
Duncan
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephane Bortzmeyer [mailto:bortzme...@nic.fr]
> Sent: 03 February 2010 13:12
> To: Duncan Berriman
> Cc: 'Matus UHLAR - fantomas'; bind-users@lists.isc.org
> Subject: Re: Host/nslookup/dig
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 11:42:19AM -,
Duncan Berriman wrote
a message of 75 lines which said:
> How do I check which one it is? I can't see any option to tell me.
which host
rpm -q -f `which host`
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc
How do I check which one it is? I can't see any option to tell me.
It should be which ever one comes with Fedora 10 or Centos 5.4 and appears
to be the following on Centos
bind-libs-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_4.2
bind-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_4.2
bind-utils-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_4.2
bind-chroot-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_4.2
And the fo
On 02.02.10 14:25, Rob Tanner wrote:
> We have two registered name servers to answer internet queries. One is on
> site and the other is a service of our ISP. The problem is that every once
> in a while the secondary server doesn¹t successfully complete zone transfers
Ha! a problem!
- check why
On 03.02.10 10:07, Duncan Berriman wrote:
> In certain versions of linux I have noticed that the host/nslookup and dig
> command query the wrong server.
>
> For instance if the following command is run it should return ;; connection
> timed out; no servers could be reached
>
> # host google.co.uk
Hi,
In certain versions of linux I have noticed that the host/nslookup and dig
command query the wrong server.
For instance if the following command is run it should return ;; connection
timed out; no servers could be reached
# host google.co.uk 123.123.123.1
However on certain versions of linu
16 matches
Mail list logo