At 11:00 06/12/2009, Chris Buxton wrote:
On Dec 5, 2009, at 5:04 AM, Kai Szymanski wrote:
> What is the way for the future: Should the browser encode idn's into
> punycode and send it to the nameserver (like example below) or should
> the browser send the un-encoded idn to the nameserver and the
At 11:06 06/12/2009, Chris Buxton wrote:
On Dec 5, 2009, at 6:34 AM, JFC Morfin wrote:
> Chris Buxton 4 décembre 2009 20:29
>> The reason IDN support in the BIND query tools (dig, host,
nslookup) is not the default is because it relies on a 3rd party
library, which must be installed and config
At 06:36 06/12/2009, Danny Mayer wrote:
JFC Morfin wrote:
> I wish to set-up my BIND DNS server on window XP as a service. I checked
> the "automatic start-up". Unfortunately it did not work. The readme1st
> guide only says that the way to do it is as usual, what does not help me
> since I never
Hello, all.
I have one question about chached information.
If I have example.com domain and let's assume registered like below.
1. root dns
example.com. 3600IN NS ns1.example.com.
3600IN NS ns2.example.com.
but my ns1.example.com dns
On Dec 5, 2009, at 6:34 AM, JFC Morfin wrote:
> Chris Buxton 4 décembre 2009 20:29
>> The reason IDN support in the BIND query tools (dig, host, nslookup) is not
>> the default is because it relies on a 3rd party library, which must be
>> installed and configured by the package builder beforeha
On Dec 5, 2009, at 5:04 AM, Kai Szymanski wrote:
> What is the way for the future: Should the browser encode idn's into
> punycode and send it to the nameserver (like example below) or should
> the browser send the un-encoded idn to the nameserver and the nameserver
> have to do the "encoding-stuf
6 matches
Mail list logo
