RE: SPF/TXT records

2009-06-17 Thread Jeff Lightner
Right my relay might want it but if so that would be in my internal view. The Exchange and Sendmail servers only allow relay from specific locations and neither is using SPF to authenticate so far as I know. My question was more related to external view - what do people on the internet expect to s

Re: SPF/TXT records

2009-06-17 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 17.06.09 10:46, Jeff Lightner wrote: > When one sets SPF/TXT record is it for the relay server/IP that sent the > email to the internet or the originating one? maybe even both. If the outgoing mail relay checks for SPF, and you don't use SMTP authentication (in which case relays may not check f

SPF/TXT records

2009-06-17 Thread Jeff Lightner
Question: When one sets SPF/TXT record is it for the relay server/IP that sent the email to the internet or the originating one? For example we have a server (atuprd01.water.com) that can not be reached via the internet. Email originating there is relayed through our MS-Exchange server (if sent

Re: Support of HIP RR (RFC 5205)

2009-06-17 Thread Mark Andrews
In message , holger.zule...@arcor.net writes: > Does anybody know if (or when) BIND supports HIP (RFC5205) > resource records ? It's in BIND 9.7. BIND 9.7.0a1 is in the process of being prepared. 2565. [func] Add support for HIP record. Includes new functions

Support of HIP RR (RFC 5205)

2009-06-17 Thread Holger . Zuleger
Does anybody know if (or when) BIND supports HIP (RFC5205) resource records ? The directory doc/rfc of bind 9.6.1 lists rfc5205, but named-checkzone will complain with an error: $ named-checkzone -v 9.6.1 $ named-checkzone -d example.net zone.db loading "example.net" from "zone.db" class "IN" z

RE: Questions about DNAME records

2009-06-17 Thread Braebaum, Neil
> -Original Message- > From: Chris Buxton [mailto:cbux...@menandmice.com] > Sent: 16 June 2009 15:40 > To: Braebaum, Neil > Cc: Bind Mailing > Subject: Re: Questions about DNAME records > > On Jun 16, 2009, at 1:37 AM, Braebaum, Neil wrote: > > What I was getting at - probably worded poor

Re: DNSDigger.com - An announcement and request for feature tips.

2009-06-17 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 02:19:22AM +0200, Jay Ess wrote a message of 19 lines which said: > DNSDigger.com - A massive reverse resolver that lets you dig deeper > into the Net. Congratulations. > 2. To ask you for feature requests. IPv6 support is certainly the first thing to add! I searched