Hi!
I use BIND as a local DNS server for 200 users. Now I am in situation
that I need to use a webhop since I need to change listening port on
apache to other than 80 ( I have another application which need to use
only port 80).
How do I configure webhop for my eg. local.domain to local.domain:100
In article ,
Takahiro Masuda wrote:
> Also try dig ip +trace
That's only useful if the domain is already delegated to the server you
want to check. I got the impression that he needs to test the server
BEFORE the delegation is implemented (because the registrar won't accept
the NS records i
Also try dig ip +trace
- Original Message -
From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org
To: comp-protocols-dns-b...@isc.org
Sent: Fri May 29 18:32:09 2009
Subject: Re: BIND do not listen on udp port 53
In article ,
Thomas Manson wrote:
> Is there a mean to query the DNS Server on UDP po
In article , "j...@voila.fr"
wrote:
> In BIND configuration, is it possible to set the RD flag to 1, because my =
> DNS Relay receives DNS Request with RD flag to 0 and the forwarding doesn't=
> work when this flag is set to 0.
> The configuration is this one : Public DNS with delegation of
In article ,
Thomas Manson wrote:
> Is there a mean to query the DNS Server on UDP port 53 with something like
> dig ? so I can be sure that it's not my server that is wrong ?
Why do you think dig doesn't default to port 53?
dig soa @
should do what you want.
--
Barry Margolin, bar...@alu
A server would first have to analyse the request to figure out to which
named instance to route the request. That would most likely eat up any time
you'd save.
2009/5/29 Eduardo Júnior
>
> Hi,
>
>
> I read about Bind which it works as follow (in general words):
>
> query -> named -> named.conf
Does anyone have a script or software they use so that I can
automatically update my "A" records when a host is unavailable.
i.e.
www.mywebserver.com has 2 IP addresses (A records): 1.1.1.1, 2.2.2.2
When 2.2.2.2 becomes unpingable, I would like to remove it's "A"
record so it is only 1.1.1.1
When
At Fri, 29 May 2009 15:17:23 -0400,
"Jesse Cabral" wrote:
> So I can understand the original goal, let me re-clarify the objective.
>
> The problem of Bind hanging is thought to be caused by an interthread lock.
First off, it's just one possibility. "Hanging" is a pretty general
symptom so we
Hi,
I read about Bind which it works as follow (in general words):
query -> named -> named.conf -> files zones
Is it possible create many named.conf, one per thread with the objetive of
to reduce queue's lenght of querys.
For example:
named.a-e.conf
named.f-m.conf
named.n-z.conf
Some query to
Hi,
Following this scheme:
query -> named.conf -> file zones
Querys are queued in the daemon named and in the files zones?
Something like that, i imagine:
general queue of querys -> named ->
queue1 -> a.com
queue2 -> b.com
.
.
.
queuen -> z.com
Is there any utility that measured the que
As per the other answers I've seen posted,
such a delay is often caused by notifies not reaching the
slave from the master. In such a case, you would not
expect a delay of a fixed time, but rather delays over a
limited range of times, e.g. up to 15 minutes.
A notify is a kind of DNS query, norma
Hello,
In BIND configuration, is it possible to set the RD flag to 1, because my DNS
Relay receives DNS Request with RD flag to 0 and the forwarding doesn't work
when this flag is set to 0.
The configuration is this one : Public DNS with delegation of the zone toto
to DNS A, public DNS sent r
fairly often (1 in 100?) dns isn't working right, but if I try again
it fixes itself.
here is an example:
client:
ju...@e18:~/vga2usb/src$ svn co http://svn.xiph.org/trunk/ffmpeg2theora
server:
var/log/dns-security.log shows:
May 29 14:54:26.343 queries: info: client 192.168.1.216#48190: query:
s
At Fri, 29 May 2009 15:41:26 -0400,
David Ford wrote:
>
> Every few releases I try to add threads back in and get the same
> results. Both on my 32bit linux and 64bit linux machines (current
> gentoo). Named crashes or hangs.
>
> Jeff Lightner wrote:
> > This may have something to do with the
Every few releases I try to add threads back in and get the same
results. Both on my 32bit linux and 64bit linux machines (current
gentoo). Named crashes or hangs.
Jeff Lightner wrote:
> This may have something to do with the different way Linux does threads
> compared to UNIX.
>
> On my RHEL5
This may have something to do with the different way Linux does threads
compared to UNIX.
On my RHEL5 servers I see named humming along quite happily with 5
threads across two processors so it may be the original hang problem had
nothing to do with threads. I tried to find something that would
At Fri, 29 May 2009 13:56:40 -0400,
"Jesse Cabral" wrote:
> I just tried that and re-ran the ./configure --disable-threads
>
> Then I killed the named pid and started named:
>
> ps -Leo user,pid,ppid,lstart,lwp,nlwp,psr,args |egrep "LWP|named"
> USER PID PPID STARTED L
Bind and threading don't get along, I have always had to force bind to
compile without thread support entirely.
Jesse Cabral wrote:
> So I can understand the original goal, let me re-clarify the objective.
>
> The problem of Bind hanging is thought to be caused by an interthread lock.
>
> The sugg
So I can understand the original goal, let me re-clarify the objective.
The problem of Bind hanging is thought to be caused by an interthread lock.
The suggestion is to disables threads.
Let me ask this questions, is the goal to disable threads on
multi-processors or threads completely ?
It app
If I should not be sending this to this list please let me know.
Please let me know if you think I have this wrong:
Bare Minimum to be considered a usable DNS server (under limited
conditions):
When a zone is configured locally as a master or slave zone, only hand
out data from the local
Hello All,
Is there a new version of rndcstats.pl available for bind-9.6.0-P1?
Regards,
Hossein Ahmadi
Verizon Wireless
The information contained in this message and any attachment may be
proprietary, confidential, and privileged or subject to the work
product doctrine and thus p
At least now it shows all the threads on a single processor.
-Original Message-
From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org
[mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Jesse Cabral
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 1:57 PM
To: 'Jeffrey Reasoner'
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: RE: Bi
Good suggestion.
I just tried that and re-ran the ./configure --disable-threads
Then I killed the named pid and started named:
ps -Leo user,pid,ppid,lstart,lwp,nlwp,psr,args |egrep "LWP|named"
USER PID PPID STARTED LWP NLWP PSR COMMAND
named14671 1 Fri May 29 13
Hi Jesse,
Have you tried a "make distclean" to remove all traces of the previous
configure or removing and re-extracting the bind tarball?
Andy
Jesse Cabral wrote:
> I can't seem to get bind reconfigured to run with no threads ? Anyone have
> any thoughts ?
>
> When I rerun ./configure --disable
I can't seem to get bind reconfigured to run with no threads ? Anyone have
any thoughts ?
When I rerun ./configure --disable-threads the configure file does not
update.
Regards,
Jesse Cabral
Solutions Engineer
Micro Technology Solutions, Inc.
Phone:508.324.9475 Fax:508.324.4477
21 Father D
By saying things like "We load the authoritative data into memory so
that is also cached data" and other nonsense the vendor is stating
that this behavior is in compliance with the RFCs and refusing to fix
their code. Very frustrating, as I believe this behavior is clearly
wrong and also se
Hi,
Thanks for the advices, i've run the test (named -g after kill) and the
realize the zonecheck of the AFNIC.FR has passed.
As I didn't do nothing in between, I guess this was maybe a temporary
error of the AFNIC.FR zonecheck utility (which says UDP port 53 was not
reachable).
Is there a m
27 matches
Mail list logo
