hi,
I want to know if the $GENERATE Directive support type NAPTR.
You know,type NAPTR is used to ENUM dns. There are large amount of NAPTR
resource records in ENUM dns;and the NAPTR resource records are very similar.It
is great if the $GENERATE Directive support type NAPTR!!!
___
Hi to everybody,
We just installed a bind version 9.4.3-P1 at our RHEL5 64bit machine and we
got this error
Apr 19 17:22:09 SVPNSCACHE3 namedlstnr0-9.4.3-P1[3337]: general:
socket.c:4524: unexpected error:
Apr 19 17:22:09 SVPNSCACHE3 namedlstnr0-9.4.3-P1[3337]: general: 22/Invalid
argument
Apr 19
On Apr 19, 2009, at 11:55 PM, Ken Lai wrote:
let's take an example. my DNS server called SrvA, the outer DNS server
called SrvB.
normally, the client sent the query to SrvA, and SrvA forwards it to
SrvB. and SrvA return a result which came from SrvB to the client.
unfortunately the SrvB sometime
dimanche 19 avril da 10:13:31, « Mark Andrews » a skriv :
>
> In message <20090418113920.2acbb...@jojo.scabb>, Beber writes:
> > exporting enable_epoll=3D"" make bind-tools build, but this bypass epoll
> > test
> > running with configure with --enable-epoll doesn't change anything, it
> > still f
At Mon, 20 Apr 2009 14:55:56 +0800,
Ken Lai wrote:
> let's take an example. my DNS server called SrvA, the outer DNS server
> called SrvB.
>
> normally, the client sent the query to SrvA, and SrvA forwards it to
> SrvB. and SrvA return a result which came from SrvB to the client.
> unfortunately
On 4/20/2009 2:55 AM, Ken Lai wrote:
normally, the client sent the query to SrvA, and SrvA forwards it to
SrvB. and SrvA return a result which came from SrvB to the client.
unfortunately the SrvB sometimes will return a A record that is a
advertisement site ip to SrvA. so i dont want to respond
On 14.04.09 14:22, Lena M wrote:
> Which TTL value is supposed to be used for negative caching time?
the one from SOA, apparently overriden by local max-ncache-ttl setting.
> -We are running BIND 9.X as a caching server. We are seeing that NXDOMAIN
> replies are being cached using $TTL time of a
> Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 10:39:59 +0300 (EEST)
> From: Petteri Heinonen
>
> Chris Buxton [cbux...@menandmice.com] wrote:
> > On Apr 19, 2009, at 8:06 AM, Petteri Heinonen wrote:
> >
> > > Hello all. I have been struggling with a seeming simple Bind
related
> > > problem. My main goal would
Petteri Heinonen wrote:
>Ok, thanks for confirming my doubts. As a related issue, how is Bind
>supposed to be used in a domain where Windows Domain Controllers are
>used for Windows domain services, but Bind is used for DNS? I mean, in
>a Windows domain DDNS updates are used by both Domain Contro
Got a complaint from a customer whose Domain ANme
was not running.
I check the affected servcies without looking at named but
still no joy.
***REstarted*** named and off we go.
Why did that happen even though named was supposedly running?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.
Chris Buxton [cbux...@menandmice.com] wrote:
On Apr 19, 2009, at 8:06 AM, Petteri Heinonen wrote:
> Hello all. I have been struggling with a seeming simple Bind related
> problem. My main goal would be to have dynamically added RRs served
> by different server than the normal statically conf
11 matches
Mail list logo
