In message <29c7b7bc-f017-4404-b011-8b50206c7...@newgeo.com>, Scott Haneda writ
es:
> Damnit, ever time I search this stuff out, I search for "named
> something-or-other" and should use BIND in my search :)
>
> I am going to test deploy on my worksation on OS X. Named comes up
> with relativ
Damnit, ever time I search this stuff out, I search for "named
something-or-other" and should use BIND in my search :)
I am going to test deploy on my worksation on OS X. Named comes up
with relative ease, just add a key and I am pretty much up and
running, albeit out of date, but for test
Use the DLZ extension. It's been around for a while.
I.e. put the following in your named.conf and use whatever interface you
wish. I use Ant with a few modifications. I don't have nearly the
number of domains that you do so my simple system works fine.
dlz "postgres zone" {
database "p
On Jan 28, 2009, at 3:34 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
In message <30e0039f-b0fd-4322-b0e0-52eeefa76...@newgeo.com>, Scott
Haneda writ
es:
I can remove the entire DNS management, zone creation, and deltion if
I wildcard. Any domain in which they enter in my clients ns's will
resolve automatically a
Hello, my past post about wildcarding the "." in a named server seems
it may be wrought with issues in the long term.
In short, my issues is a auto website creation tool that needs to be
simple for users to change their registrar data, and have their site
be served up.
The old method work
Mark Andrews wrote:
>> 0.86.80.98 14051
>
> So who isn't doing even loose URPF?
> 0/8 is totally bogus and is a attack directed at you.
Well, if you do a tracert to granite.ab.ca you can see my upstream provider.
I was
wondering what that 0 was doing there.
Tony
--
Tony Toews
In message , "Tony Toews [MVP]" wri
tes:
> "Tony Toews [MVP]" wrote:
>
> >FWIW In the last 28 hours I have the following alleged IP addresses and coun
> t in my
> >log file.
> >
> >Real lookups 1665
> >204.15.80.50 4
> >3.217.28.226 1144
> >4.57.246.146 9541
> >6.9.16.171 577
> >63.217.28.226
"Tony Toews [MVP]" wrote:
>FWIW In the last 28 hours I have the following alleged IP addresses and count
>in my
>log file.
>
>Real lookups 1665
>204.15.80.50 4
>3.217.28.226 1144
>4.57.246.146 9541
>6.9.16.171 577
>63.217.28.226 1463
>64.57.246.146 35163
>65.173.218.96 1
>67.192.1
In message <30e0039f-b0fd-4322-b0e0-52eeefa76...@newgeo.com>, Scott Haneda writ
es:
> I can remove the entire DNS management, zone creation, and deltion if
> I wildcard. Any domain in which they enter in my clients ns's will
> resolve automatically as soon as the whois updates.
Actual
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
I strongly recommend you upgrading the BIND first. Later versions issue that
message much less often.
if the only reason is the fix mentioned by Mark
2504. [bug] Address race condition in the socket code.
then that doesn't explain why my small manual sample
At Wed, 28 Jan 2009 08:59:42 +0100,
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > >Of course I could just copy and paste all the zones also in 'custom' view
> > >but it doubles the configuration size.
>
> On 27.01.09 17:26, Chris Burton wrote:
> > I've been using an include file for zones common between mu
Excuse any spelling. I'm mobile.
I would be wildcarding "."
My client has a website building service. You get a free account and
tools to get your site online all built in a browser with web based
tools.
It works well now but the synchronization of the database with named,
users coming a
What specifically are you intending to wildcard? "com."? "net."? "."?
If so, then you would be implicitly making your name servers
authoritative for domains for which your servers are not supposed to be
authoritative.
Ben Bridges
> -Original Message-
> From: bind-users-boun...@lists.
Mark Andrews wrote:
In message <497caef2.80...@yahoo.com>, Andre LeClaire writes:
Hello everyone,
I've been seeing these syslog messages for about a week on a FreeBSD
server running BIND 9.4.3-P1:
Jan 25 02:35:21 asimov named[145]: client 206.71.158.30#138: error
sending response: permission
In article ,
Jan Arild =?iso-8859-1?Q?Lindstr=F8m?= wrote:
>
>Hi,
>
>ah, of course. I did not think about it as a Solaris bug.
>
>I patched BIND 9.6.0-P1 os.c code so it first checks for the diretory
>before it tries the fast approach of just running mkdir. And that of
>course works fine.
>
>But,
If the dns only needs to resolve certain domains (you manage) and no other,
it can be done
Regards,
Serge Fonville
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Alan Clegg wrote:
> Scott Haneda wrote:
>
> > An example would be:
> > some-domain-foo.com is registered. My NS of ns-me.example.com is set up
> >
Scott Haneda wrote:
> An example would be:
> some-domain-foo.com is registered. My NS of ns-me.example.com is set up
> and working, but does not have some-domain-foo.com entered as a zone.
> When a request comes in for some-domain-foo.com I want an A record for
> an IP of my choice, also for www.
Ashish wrote:
> This is regarding the recent security threat CVE-2009-0025.
>
> We are using DNS 9.3.0 and unfortunately, we cannot upgrade (management
> issues) to 9.3.6 (As suggested in ISC website)
>
> ISC’s website suggests to Upgrade OpenSSL to at least OpenSSL 0.9.8j and
> then to upgrade
Hi Folks,
This is regarding the recent security threat CVE-2009-0025.
We are using DNS 9.3.0 and unfortunately, we cannot upgrade (management
issues) to 9.3.6 (As suggested in ISC website)
ISC's website suggests to Upgrade OpenSSL to at least OpenSSL 0.9.8j and
then to upgrade to 9.3.6-
Hello, I am wondering the technical possibility of a DNS change. Even
if it is technically possible, I also want to make sure it is
compliant as well.
I would like to resolve any and all requests to a fixed IP, if there
is no zone in place. While I understand I can create a zone for
*.e
Sorry remembered wrong, it's not free. But not that expensive either.
Yeah now I remember, I browsed for a free firewall for server platform for
days, but didn't find any.
But have been very happy with the Net Firewall.
Jukka
"Tony Toews [MVP]" kirjoitti
viestissä:...
"Jukka Pakkanen"
In that case you can use either views or a split dns
Regards.
Serge Fonville
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 12:44 AM, Luis Silva wrote:
> Yes, basically what I need is a forwarder. Basically I want an internal
> network but external queries must be handled by another server.
> Thanks a lot for the qui
> Dean Clapper wrote:
> >I'm trying to troubleshoot why we are getting a lot of disabling EDNS
> >messages in /var/log/messages.
> >
> >We are running bind-9.5.0.P2 on a linux box.
[...]
> >Jan 27 11:43:39 ns0 named[27764]: too many timeouts resolving
> >'196.198.117.216.zen.spamhaus.org/A' (in '
Hi,
ah, of course. I did not think about it as a Solaris bug.
I patched BIND 9.6.0-P1 os.c code so it first checks for the diretory before
it tries the fast approach of just running mkdir. And that of course works fine.
But, since I do not want to run a self-patch BIND in production, I will in
On 27.01.09 10:18, Al Stu wrote:
> I not only say it, I have demonstrated it.
But you have demonstrated something different than we're discussing all the
time.
> BIND is the DNS system we are discussing.
> Have not looked to see if that specifically is spec'ed in an RFC.
> Yes other DNS implement
> > You say, "both the A record and the CNAME record are returned."
> > We know that BIND does this.
On 27.01.09 19:33, sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
> No, not all BIND versions do this. I'm running BIND 9.5, and when
> asking about the MX for nullmx.domainmanager.com I'm getting
>
> Answer:
In message <49800cfd.nihabiqjcalhfl+u%akos...@andykosela.com>, Andy Kosela writ
es:
> "Reinis Rozitis" wrote:
>
> > > I've been using an include file for zones common between multiple
> > > views, might help in your case too.
> >
> > Thanks somehow didnt think about this way. Pretty much takes
> >Of course I could just copy and paste all the zones also in 'custom' view
> >but it doubles the configuration size.
On 27.01.09 17:26, Chris Burton wrote:
> I've been using an include file for zones common between multiple views, it
> might help in your case too.
I'm afraid they won't eat the
28 matches
Mail list logo
