ponga2...@gmail.com wrote on 15 Dec 2008 16:34:
> I'd be very interested in what others find. I do have an update and
> correction to my original post:
>
> The format is 9chars.8chars - as an example:
> qjnqrtfun.wxsifmgj
> Sometimes a colon appears, so the char list seems to be [a-z:]
> Also, I
In message <_aednq2trrolj9runz2dnuvz_tlin...@posted.hiwaay2>, Chris Adams write
s:
> Once upon a time, Mark Andrews said:
> > I've raised a ticket with our ops people.
>
> While you are at it, could you see about fixing the Usenet threading?
> It appears messages from the mail-to-news gatew
I'd be very interested in what others find. I do have an update and
correction to my original post:
The format is 9chars.8chars - as an example:
qjnqrtfun.wxsifmgj
Sometimes a colon appears, so the char list seems to be [a-z:]
Also, I was wrong about the FQDN - they do appear in named/bind logs -
Once upon a time, Mark Andrews said:
> I've raised a ticket with our ops people.
While you are at it, could you see about fixing the Usenet threading?
It appears messages from the mail-to-news gateway get the Message-ID:
changed (often a bad idea) BUT the gateway doesn't update the
Referen
Thanks for the tip. I've asked those with the proper authority to
verify the registrar's records.
I must admit that I find it unusual that this needs to be done. In my
experience, the glue records automatically change when a domain's name
servers are altered. However, I have never worked wi
You need to contact the registar for netdentalcare.com and
update the HOST record for ns.netdentalcare.com to have the
new address record. This changes what GLUE is published
in the COM zone.
Mark
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 211
In message <029c7576bb4b4f1480bf8cf9d125a...@nc4010>, "Jukka Pakkanen" writes:
> Sorry I've lost track of the different versions, which works in Windows and
> which don't.
>
> So... what is the latest version, working in W2K3?
See the "immediate downloads" on https://www.isc.org/softwar
They've been changed for days:
> ns.netdentalcare.com.
Server: ns1.idaserver.com.
Address:207.178.132.75#53
QUESTIONS:
ns.netdentalcare.com, type = A, class = IN
ANSWERS:
-> ns.netdentalcare.com
internet address = 207.178.132.75
AUTHO
> Sorry I've lost track of the different versions, which works in Windows and
> which don't.
>
> So... what is the latest version, working in W2K3? And Is W2K still
> abandoned?
9.3.6, 9.4.3, or 9.5.0-P2-W2 (which is soon to be supplanted by 9.5.1,
currently in release-candidate status, as is
Absolutely. Note the listed authoritative servers in the snippet I
included. Those are the new ones.
--
Milo Hyson
Chief Scientist
CyberLife Labs
On Dec 15, 2008, at 15:40, David Ford wrote:
did you update the ns records with your registrar?
Milo Hyson wrote:
I'm seeing what looks like a st
At Mon, 15 Dec 2008 17:18:21 +0100,
Alexander Gall wrote:
> > http://members.iinet.com.au/~pyard...@ihug.com.au/#%5B%5BBIND%209.5%20DNS%20Stats%5D%5D
>
> This looks useful, thanks. However, ISC has chosen to change some
> tags in 9.6.0rc1 (nsstats -> nsstat, zonestats -> zonestat, resstats ->
>
Sorry I've lost track of the different versions, which works in Windows and
which don't.
So... what is the latest version, working in W2K3? And Is W2K still
abandoned?
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mail
In message , Milo Hyson
writes:
> I'm seeing what looks like a stuck glue record in the GTLD servers and
> I'm hoping I've just overlooked something simple. There are several
> domains which list the following as their nameservers:
>
> ns.netdentalcare.com
> ns2.netdentalcare.com
did you update the ns records with your registrar?
Milo Hyson wrote:
> I'm seeing what looks like a stuck glue record in the GTLD servers and
> I'm hoping I've just overlooked something simple. There are several
> domains which list the following as their nameservers:
I'm seeing what looks like a stuck glue record in the GTLD servers and
I'm hoping I've just overlooked something simple. There are several
domains which list the following as their nameservers:
ns.netdentalcare.com
ns2.netdentalcare.com
The zone for these (netdentalcare.com)
At Thu, 20 Nov 2008 19:12:49 -0800,
"D. Stussy" wrote:
> Using the same .xls page to format as I did with 9.5.1b1, some of the
> sections don't have data. Something was altered between these two
> versions, but the release notes say NOTHING about any change to the
> statistics web server feature
ponga2...@gmail.com wrote:
> I'm seeing name queries from a couple clients on the network that
> occur around every two minutes - the queries are evidently random and
> are looking for A IN records of this form, as an example:
>
> ungzbvyf.lzghmccim
>
> They always look like this, 8 lowercase cha
I'm seeing name queries from a couple clients on the network that
occur around every two minutes - the queries are evidently random and
are looking for A IN records of this form, as an example:
ungzbvyf.lzghmccim
They always look like this, 8 lowercase chars, dot, then 9 lowercase
chars - never a
Mark Andrews writes:
>
>
>
> In message <9fc47420fb263da9eda170166fd4d...@cornell.edu>, John Wobus writes:
> > Some years ago, I had that issue. The problem was that the
> > zone transfer compression mechanism could change the case
> > of individual names. This was fixed in some release of bi
In message <9fc47420fb263da9eda170166fd4d...@cornell.edu>, John Wobus writes:
> Some years ago, I had that issue. The problem was that the
> zone transfer compression mechanism could change the case
> of individual names. This was fixed in some release of bind
> (after 9.2.1, if I remember cor
In message , Sam Wilson wri
tes:
> In article ,
> Chris Buxton wrote:
>
> > On Dec 11, 2008, at 10:57 PM, Barry Margolin wrote:
> > > The old mail-to-news gateway either got this right or
> > > extracted the plain text alternative before forwarding.
> >
> > The old mail server stripped message
Out of curiosity, if one zone is to hold 50 million records, what
would they all be for? I can't even imagine blogspot or godaddy being
in that league.
Perhaps with this many records just using a wldcard would be simpler?
Then again maybe this is a new tld, or old one being consolidated?
--
At Sat, 13 Dec 2008 17:09:57 +0530,
"Vinay Y S" wrote:
> I am studying the scalability and performance characteristics of
> different DNS servers. Goal is to find the best suitable server to
> host a single domain with 50 million records. I am planning to install
> Fedora 10 x86_64 on a 32GB RAM
Some years ago, I had that issue. The problem was that the
zone transfer compression mechanism could change the case
of individual names. This was fixed in some release of bind
(after 9.2.1, if I remember correctly), and bind release notes
would pinpoint the exact version with the change.
The p
In article , sch...@adi.com (Thomas Schulz)
wrote:
> In article ,
> =?UTF-8?B?TGVvbmFyZG8gUm9kcmlndWVzIE1hZ2FsaMOjZXM=?=
> wrote:
> >[base64 guff]
>
>
> You know, the above is not very usefull. Can someone please fix the
> newsgroup gateway.
The content is below. I forward it only be
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 17:12:21 +1100, Peter Yardley said:
> I have written a script to collect data from the XML stats channel of a
> Bind 9.5+ DNS server. It works with Cricket and should work with MRTG
> and Cacti.
> You can get it here...
> http://members.iinet.com.au/~pyard...@ihug.com.au/
>
I reaching out to the list on what appears to be a very odd issue that
happened over the weekend.
We had an issue where some internal domains had the TLD capitalized after
the zone transfer.
i.e. foo.bar.com on the master became foo.bar.COM on the slave.
I know that DNS is case insensitive but it c
In article ,
=?UTF-8?B?TGVvbmFyZG8gUm9kcmlndWVzIE1hZ2FsaMOjZXM=?=
wrote:
>CgpQZXRlciBEYW1iaWVyIGVzY3JldmV1Ogo+IEkgY2FuIGNvbmZpcm0gYmluZCA5LjQgZG9lcyBy
>dW4gb24gYW4gKElCTSwgbm90IEludGVsKSA0ODYtU0NMLzIgd2l0aCAxNiBNQi4KPiBUaGF0IGNw
>dSBjYW4gYWRkcmVzcyBubyBtb3JlIHRoYW4gMTYgTUIuCj4KPiAkIGNhdCA
I just test bind 9.5.0-P2 and 9.5.1-rc1
Bind 9.5.0-P2 allocate over 2Gb per 10 minutes of work.
Bind 9.5.1 allocate 2Gb per 30 hours.
14.12.2008, в 2:15, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 написал(а):
At Sat, 13 Dec 2008 11:50:52 -0200,
Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães wrote:
i'm trying to run bind 9.5.0-P
In article ,
Chris Buxton wrote:
> On Dec 11, 2008, at 10:57 PM, Barry Margolin wrote:
> > The old mail-to-news gateway either got this right or
> > extracted the plain text alternative before forwarding.
>
> The old mail server stripped messages down to their plaintext values.
> The new one
In article , sch...@adi.com (Thomas Schulz)
wrote:
> I was wondering what was going on. Some messages are just base64 and are
> completely useless/unreadable.
If you have mimencode you could try this:
$ mimencode -u > /tmp/weird ; less /tmp/weird
On Mac OS X and other systems with the right
Thank's to JINMEI Tatuya for support.
I have over 40 views, defined in named.conf, max-memory for cache -
32Mb. Named daemon allocate over 2 Gb per 24 hours of work.
Have you any ideas how to limit memory usage?
Dmitry Rybin wrote:
> max-cache-size 64M;
> # /usr/bin/limits -v 1200M /usr/local/sbi
> Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 11:52:01 +0100
> From: Peter Dambier
> To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
> Subject: Re: Where is the open recursion test?
> X-FuHaFi: 0.62
>
> just try
>
> dig -t any peter-dambier.de @
>
> If it tells you something about denic it is not recursive.
> If you get the complete
just try
dig -t any peter-dambier.de @
If it tells you something about denic it is not recursive.
If you get the complete answer it is very likely recursive.
Something internal could have triggered the query but only
if your server is in /etc/resolv.conf.
Kind regards
Peter
Gregory Hicks wrot
> Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 06:44:18 -0200
> From: Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães
>
> Gregory Hicks escreveu:
> > Greetings:
> >
> > Seeing in my named.log entries for "too many timeouts resolving
> > ''..." makes me wonder if my server is an
> > open recursive server.
> >
> > Where is the test pleas
Gregory Hicks escreveu:
Greetings:
Seeing in my named.log entries for "too many timeouts resolving
''..." makes me wonder if my server is an
open recursive server.
Where is the test please for open recursion so I can check?
http://dns.measurement-factory.com/cgi-bin/openresolvercheck.pl
36 matches
Mail list logo
