so does this memory leak only occur if
@ISC_ARCH_DIR@ is "noatomic" under FreeBSD amd64?
and not when its "x86_32" ?
--- On Fri, 11/28/08, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: dnsperf and BIND memory consumption
> To: [EM
At Thu, 27 Nov 2008 23:04:58 -0800 (PST),
ivan jr sy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - with a minor tweak, it fixed the memory consumption problem.
>
> if you compile BIND9.5.0-P2 on FreeBSD by hand, the host_cpu is 'x86_32'
> # grep -e "host_cpu" -e "ARCH" config.log
> ISC_ARCH_DIR='x86_32'
> host_
Could it be as simple as the ARCH not compatible with BIND 9.5.0 FreeBSD port
under FreeBSD AMD??
- with a minor tweak, it fixed the memory consumption problem.
if you compile BIND9.5.0-P2 on FreeBSD by hand, the host_cpu is 'x86_32'
# grep -e "host_cpu" -e "ARCH" config.log
ISC_ARCH_DIR='x86_32'
Thanks, the suggestion below looks like it might be what I'm looking for.
ds
> You can in fact set up the environment I described using views. Just
> have the private view forward to the internet view. The following
> resolving name server will ignore referrals to private name servers
> for outsi
On 27-Nov-2008, at 11:50 , Jakub Heichman wrote:
Hello all,
I'm looking to implementing a DNS server based on bind-dlz with mysql
backend that would allow me to give different DNS responses based on
clients' IP addresses.
The closest match to this in BIND currently is views. If you've got
Hello all,
I'm looking to implementing a DNS server based on bind-dlz with mysql
backend that would allow me to give different DNS responses based on
clients' IP addresses.
I have found this post to bind-dlz-testers from back in 2006:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=loom.
6 matches
Mail list logo