Re: Help understanding lame server error

Scott Haneda wrote: I have a good deal if lame server errors in my logs, which I am not entirely understanding. 19-Nov-2008 15:36:34.657 lame-servers: info: lame server resolving '170.73.234.209.in-addr.arpa' (in '73.234.209.in-addr.arpa'?): 209.234.64.192#53 73.234.209.in-addr.arpa has been

Re: Help understanding lame server error

They are most likely reverse lookups from your MTA. Borked reverse zones are quite common. Len - Original Message From: Scott Haneda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: BIND Users Mailing List Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 3:57:15 PM Subject: Help understanding lame server error I have a

Re: Help understanding lame server error

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Scott Haneda write s: > I have a good deal if lame server errors in my logs, which I am not > entirely understanding. > > 19-Nov-2008 15:36:34.657 lame-servers: info: lame server resolving > '170.73.234.209.in-addr.arpa' (in '73.234.209.in-addr.arpa'?): > 209

Help understanding lame server error

I have a good deal if lame server errors in my logs, which I am not entirely understanding. 19-Nov-2008 15:36:34.657 lame-servers: info: lame server resolving '170.73.234.209.in-addr.arpa' (in '73.234.209.in-addr.arpa'?): 209.234.64.192#53 19-Nov-2008 15:36:34.955 lame-servers: info: lame s

Re: Workaround Solaris's kernel bug

At Wed, 19 Nov 2008 16:24:47 -0500 (EST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Schulz) wrote: > Change 2489 says to define ISC_SOCKET_USE_POLLWATCH to workaround a > Solaris kernel bug about /dev/poll. How do I know if I should define > this? Should I just assume that if I am running Sloaris 8 then I need

Re: bind9 no longer detect my ipv6 interface after having upgrade from ubuntu server 8.04 to 8.10

yes... but in order to test the ipv6 layer, ping6 is appropriate ;) On 19/11/2008, Stephane Bortzmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 02:17:46PM +0100, > Manson Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > a message of 150 lines which said: > >> Yesterday I configure a new '.fr' dom

Re: Question about BIND 9.3.6 on Solaris

At Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:59:20 -0500, Jeff Wieland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1. Does change 2469 - "solaris: Work around Solaris's select() limitations. > [RT #18769]" address the same problem as change 2406 in 9.3.5-P2 - "Some > operating systems have FD_SETSIZE set to a low value by default..

Workaround Solaris's kernel bug

Change 2489 says to define ISC_SOCKET_USE_POLLWATCH to workaround a Solaris kernel bug about /dev/poll. How do I know if I should define this? Should I just assume that if I am running Sloaris 8 then I need to define ISC_SOCKET_USE_POLLWATCH? Is there any down side to defining this if it is not

Is it possible to use one KSK for multiple domains?

Hi all, does anyone know if is it possible to sign multiple domains with one KSK? If I understand correctly what RFC 4034, section 2.1.1 says "... If bit 7 has value 1, then the DNSKEY record holds a DNS zone key, and the DNSKEY RR's owner name MUST be the name of a zone..." it is impossible. Eac

Question about BIND 9.3.6 on Solaris

Two things: 1. Does change 2469 - "solaris: Work around Solaris's select() limitations. [RT #18769]" address the same problem as change 2406 in 9.3.5-P2 - "Some operating systems have FD_SETSIZE set to a low value by default... [RT #18328]"? If not, what happened to RT #18328? 2. I'm assumi

Question about BIND 9.3.6 on Solaris

Two things: 1. Does change 2469 - "solaris: Work around Solaris's select() limitations. [RT #18769]" address the same problem as change 2406 in 9.3.5-P2 - "Some operating systems have FD_SETSIZE set to a low value by default... [RT #18328]"? If not, what happened to RT #18328? 2. I'm assumi

Re: socket: too many open file descriptors

At Wed, 19 Nov 2008 04:03:23 -0800 (PST), pollex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Running bind9 9.3.4-2etch3 on Debian etch 4.0(last stable version with > > apt-get install bind9) and I continue to get "socket: too many open > > file descriptors" messages. > The version of bind is "BIND 9.3.4-P1.1"

Re: socket: too many open file descriptors

On Nov 19, 2008, at 5:03 AM, pollex wrote: The version of bind is "BIND 9.3.4-P1.1" And the error appears when named open around of 1000 sockets: lsof | grep named | wc -l 968 If I have to reinstall bind, there are any way to do it via apt-get? Or the only way is compiling the binaries? Thanks

Re: socket: too many open file descriptors

On 18 nov, 18:50, Fr34k <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > When we were using 9.5.0-P2, we had to compile with 4096 FDs; otherwise, we= >  saw the same socket complaints. > > The default only has 1024. It would appear that your environment may requir= > e more FDs as ours did. > > HTH -- Chris

Re: bind9 no longer detect my ipv6 interface after having upgrade from ubuntu server 8.04 to 8.10

On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 02:17:46PM +0100, Manson Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 150 lines which said: > Yesterday I configure a new '.fr' domain which require a > successfull zonecheck That's a good example of why it is a good thing... > f: Server doesn't listen/answer on por

Re: bind9 no longer detect my ipv6 interface after having upgrade from ubuntu server 8.04 to 8.10

Hi, A bug already has been opened on the ubuntu bug tracker, I'll forward your answer into the bug ticket as I didn't see it. Thanks for your help ! Thomas. On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 19:42, Adam Tkac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 04:13:35PM +0100, Thomas Manson wrote: