The problem might be a lack of replication/synchronization between
servers. I notice that the ultradns.net servers think they've got the
master copy, while your servers disagree.
$ dig discoversunriver.com +nssearch
SOA udns1.ultradns.net. michael_cline.hotmail.com. 2008061900 10800
3600 12
It's resolving correctly from dnsstuff.com ...
Shawn Somers
Systems Administrator
Skynet BroadBand
(360)802-6657
Steve Koon wrote:
I have one of my zones that is not showing one of the A records when
using Dig anyone know why this is happening?
*emailclickA
Can I see your dig command and results?
Seems to work ok for me when I use default servers, in this case I use
openDNS:
( I also get good results with other NS's as well )
$dig emailclick.discoversunriver.com
; <<>> DiG 9.4.2-P2 <<>> emailclick.discoversunriver.com
;; global options: printcm
I have one of my zones that is not showing one of the A records when
using Dig anyone know why this is happening?
emailclickA 64.186.224.244
Thanks,
Steve
=== Zone file content on secondary
$ORIGIN .
$TTL 900 ;
Hello,
When we were using 9.5.0-P2, we had to compile with 4096 FDs; otherwise, we saw
the same socket complaints.
The default only has 1024. It would appear that your environment may require
more FDs as ours did.
HTH -- Chris
- Original Message
From: pollex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
T
At Tue, 18 Nov 2008 06:04:55 -0800 (PST),
pollex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Running bind9 9.3.4-2etch3 on Debian etch 4.0(last stable version with
> apt-get install bind9) and I continue to get "socket: too many open
> file descriptors" messages.
This version number is not very informative outs
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Manson Thomas
> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 8:18 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: bind9 no longer detect my ipv6 interface after having upgrade
> fromubuntu server 8.04 to 8.10
>
> Hi,
>
>
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 04:13:35PM +0100, Thomas Manson wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
> I've my secondary DNS Server that run bind9 version 9.5.0-P2 (from ubuntu
> 8.10 server)
>
> Before, I was using the version on ubuntu 8.04 and it was working
> successfully with ipv6.
>
I think BIND from Ubuntu dis
On 17.11.08 05:10, Mark Andrews wrote:
> https://www.isc.org/software/bind/documentation
> which is in the bullet list as
> Documentation and external links (Reference manuals, FAQ, etc)
> on https://www.isc.org/software/bind
- the HTML version of 9.5 ARM is said to be there, but I can't see the l
Rede
Industrial
SIGMA - Software Gratuito de Gerenciamento da Manutenção Mais Utilizado do Brasil!
2008
PLANEJAMENTO E CONTROLE DA
At Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:29:05 +0200,
Daniel Dawalibi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The value of max-cache-size is unlimited. We installed another version of
> bind on different servers, but we are still facing the same issue.
Please be more specific. Exactly which "another version" did you try?
Wh
Hello,
Running bind9 9.3.4-2etch3 on Debian etch 4.0(last stable version with
apt-get install bind9) and I continue to get "socket: too many open
file descriptors" messages.
my ulimit -a:
core file size (blocks, -c) 0
data seg size (kbytes, -d) unlimited
max nice
Trying update again, text was missing:
Please disregard, this is working now. Was either an ASA DNS filter
(turned off and on again during testing) or setting both servers to run
bind9.3.5-P2.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave
Please disregard. This is working now. Was either an ASA firewall dns
filter which was stopped and restarted during testing or the setting of
both nameservers to run bind9.3.5-P2.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Davenport, Steve
M
Se
Hi,
I've my secondary DNS Server that run bind9 version 9.5.0-P2 (from ubuntu 9.10
server)
Before, I was using the version on ubuntu 8.04 and it was working successfully.
Yesterday I configure a new '.fr' domain which require a successfull zonecheck
and I got the following error :
___
Hi,
I've my secondary DNS Server that run bind9 version 9.5.0-P2 (from ubuntu
8.10 server)
Before, I was using the version on ubuntu 8.04 and it was working
successfully with ipv6.
Yesterday I configure a new '.fr' domain which require a successfull
zonecheck and I got the following error :
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 07:09:59AM -0500, Davenport, Steve M wrote:
> On an external server dig gives:
>
> $ dig @harley.mc.utmck.edu -x 165.6.6.27
> ;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached
> Internally the same query is fine:
>
> The config file has "allow query" set on the rever
That reminds me of the debate over V chips/parental controls. People
that DON'T want something think it is the responsibility of others not
to send it to them rather than THEIR own responsibility to block it with
the tools they have.
If you don't want HTML just set up a rule in your mail client t
Chris,
Thanks that worked.
RootNet08
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 12:46 AM, Chris Buxton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Remove your subnet from the bogons ACL at the beginning.
>
> acl bogons {
> ! 192.168.16.0/21;
> 0.0.0.0/8;
> [...]
> 192.168.0.0/16;
> [...]
> };
>
> Chris Buxton
> Professional
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 09:38:13PM -0600, root net wrote:
> I have a server I am testing before I put in production. Working on a more
> secure bind config. BTW if anyone has any other suggestions on locking down
> bind beside below and chroot let me know.
Use TSIG for master-slave communication,
> The mailing list conversion requires a little explanation:
>
> * The new one-stop page for all the lists under isc.org is
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo
Now, can it be configured to strip or reject html rubbish?
___
bind-users mailing
Hello,
I am having issues with reverse lookups failing and can not find the
cause. Running bind 9.3.5-P1 and 9.3.6rc1.
On an external server dig gives:
$ dig @harley.mc.utmck.edu -x 165.6.6.27
; <<>> DiG 9.5.0-P1 <<>> @harley.mc.utmck.edu -x 165.6.6.27
; (1 server found)
;; global options: pr
Hello
The value of max-cache-size is unlimited. We installed another version of
bind on different servers, but we are still facing the same issue.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thomas Schulz
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 10:39 PM
To:
Hello,
I am having issues with reverse lookups failing and can not find the cause.
Running bind 9.3.5-P1 and 9.3.6rc1.
On an external server dig gives:
$ dig @harley.mc.utmck.edu -x 165.6.6.27
; <<>> DiG 9.5.0-P1 <<>> @harley.mc.utmck.edu -x 165.6.6.27
; (1 server found)
;; global options: pr
Les Caudle wrote:
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 10:26:11 +1100, Mark Andrews
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Les Caudle writes:
I noticed that I could not access this web page from within my
network:
http://worldnet.att.net/general-info/bls_info/block_inquiry.html
I
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 08:25:13PM -0800,
Merton Campbell Crockett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 51 lines which said:
> My colleagues decided to do away with the delegations and separate
> zone files and placed all the PTR records in a single zone file.
This is mostly a matter of tast
Hey, maybe it's time to agree to disagree on this one? If Bert and Ernie can
live together in roommate bliss, I'm sure we can all accept and appreciate
each others differences.
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 7:47 PM, Kevin Darcy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Just because ind
Remove your subnet from the bogons ACL at the beginning.
acl bogons {
! 192.168.16.0/21;
0.0.0.0/8;
[...]
192.168.0.0/16;
[...]
};
Chris Buxton
Professional Services
Men & Mice
On Nov 17, 2008, at 8:38 PM, root net wrote:
Hello,
I have a server I am te
28 matches
Mail list logo