Re: Zone does not show an A record when using Dig

2008-11-18 Thread Chris Buxton
The problem might be a lack of replication/synchronization between servers. I notice that the ultradns.net servers think they've got the master copy, while your servers disagree. $ dig discoversunriver.com +nssearch SOA udns1.ultradns.net. michael_cline.hotmail.com. 2008061900 10800 3600 12

Re: Zone does not show an A record when using Dig

2008-11-18 Thread Shawn Somers
It's resolving correctly from dnsstuff.com ... Shawn Somers Systems Administrator Skynet BroadBand (360)802-6657 Steve Koon wrote: I have one of my zones that is not showing one of the A records when using Dig anyone know why this is happening? *emailclickA

Re: Zone does not show an A record when using Dig

2008-11-18 Thread Scott Haneda
Can I see your dig command and results? Seems to work ok for me when I use default servers, in this case I use openDNS: ( I also get good results with other NS's as well ) $dig emailclick.discoversunriver.com ; <<>> DiG 9.4.2-P2 <<>> emailclick.discoversunriver.com ;; global options: printcm

Zone does not show an A record when using Dig

2008-11-18 Thread Steve Koon
I have one of my zones that is not showing one of the A records when using Dig anyone know why this is happening? emailclickA 64.186.224.244 Thanks, Steve === Zone file content on secondary $ORIGIN . $TTL 900 ;

Re: socket: too many open file descriptors

2008-11-18 Thread Fr34k
Hello, When we were using 9.5.0-P2, we had to compile with 4096 FDs; otherwise, we saw the same socket complaints. The default only has 1024. It would appear that your environment may require more FDs as ours did. HTH -- Chris   - Original Message From: pollex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> T

Re: socket: too many open file descriptors

2008-11-18 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
At Tue, 18 Nov 2008 06:04:55 -0800 (PST), pollex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Running bind9 9.3.4-2etch3 on Debian etch 4.0(last stable version with > apt-get install bind9) and I continue to get "socket: too many open > file descriptors" messages. This version number is not very informative outs

RE: bind9 no longer detect my ipv6 interface after having upgrade fromubuntu server 8.04 to 8.10

2008-11-18 Thread James Pratt
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of Manson Thomas > Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 8:18 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: bind9 no longer detect my ipv6 interface after having upgrade > fromubuntu server 8.04 to 8.10 > > Hi, > >

Re: bind9 no longer detect my ipv6 interface after having upgrade from ubuntu server 8.04 to 8.10

2008-11-18 Thread Adam Tkac
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 04:13:35PM +0100, Thomas Manson wrote: > Hi, Hi, > I've my secondary DNS Server that run bind9 version 9.5.0-P2 (from ubuntu > 8.10 server) > > Before, I was using the version on ubuntu 8.04 and it was working > successfully with ipv6. > I think BIND from Ubuntu dis

Re: ISC launches new website and mailing list manager

2008-11-18 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 17.11.08 05:10, Mark Andrews wrote: > https://www.isc.org/software/bind/documentation > which is in the bullet list as > Documentation and external links (Reference manuals, FAQ, etc) > on https://www.isc.org/software/bind - the HTML version of 9.5 ARM is said to be there, but I can't see the l

[SPAM] SIGMA - Software Gratuito de Gerenciamento da Manutenção

2008-11-18 Thread Mara Machado
Rede Industrial SIGMA - Software Gratuito de Gerenciamento da Manutenção Mais Utilizado do Brasil! 2008 PLANEJAMENTO E CONTROLE DA

Re: BIND 9.5.0-P2 DNS issue

2008-11-18 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
At Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:29:05 +0200, Daniel Dawalibi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The value of max-cache-size is unlimited. We installed another version of > bind on different servers, but we are still facing the same issue. Please be more specific. Exactly which "another version" did you try? Wh

socket: too many open file descriptors

2008-11-18 Thread pollex
Hello, Running bind9 9.3.4-2etch3 on Debian etch 4.0(last stable version with apt-get install bind9) and I continue to get "socket: too many open file descriptors" messages. my ulimit -a: core file size (blocks, -c) 0 data seg size (kbytes, -d) unlimited max nice

RE: Reverse lookups failing

2008-11-18 Thread Davenport, Steve M
Trying update again, text was missing: Please disregard, this is working now. Was either an ASA DNS filter (turned off and on again during testing) or setting both servers to run bind9.3.5-P2. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave

RE: Reverse lookups failing

2008-11-18 Thread Davenport, Steve M
Please disregard. This is working now. Was either an ASA firewall dns filter which was stopped and restarted during testing or the setting of both nameservers to run bind9.3.5-P2. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Davenport, Steve M Se

bind9 no longer detect my ipv6 interface after having upgrade from ubuntu server 8.04 to 8.10

2008-11-18 Thread Manson Thomas
Hi, I've my secondary DNS Server that run bind9 version 9.5.0-P2 (from ubuntu 9.10 server) Before, I was using the version on ubuntu 8.04 and it was working successfully. Yesterday I configure a new '.fr' domain which require a successfull zonecheck and I got the following error : ___

bind9 no longer detect my ipv6 interface after having upgrade from ubuntu server 8.04 to 8.10

2008-11-18 Thread Thomas Manson
Hi, I've my secondary DNS Server that run bind9 version 9.5.0-P2 (from ubuntu 8.10 server) Before, I was using the version on ubuntu 8.04 and it was working successfully with ipv6. Yesterday I configure a new '.fr' domain which require a successfull zonecheck and I got the following error :

Re: Slave Servers Return SERVFAIL

2008-11-18 Thread Justin T Pryzby
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 07:09:59AM -0500, Davenport, Steve M wrote: > On an external server dig gives: > > $ dig @harley.mc.utmck.edu -x 165.6.6.27 > ;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached > Internally the same query is fine: > > The config file has "allow query" set on the rever

RE: ISC launches new website and mailing list manager

2008-11-18 Thread Jeff Lightner
That reminds me of the debate over V chips/parental controls. People that DON'T want something think it is the responsibility of others not to send it to them rather than THEIR own responsibility to block it with the tools they have. If you don't want HTML just set up a rule in your mail client t

Re: Views and Blackhole

2008-11-18 Thread root net
Chris, Thanks that worked. RootNet08 On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 12:46 AM, Chris Buxton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Remove your subnet from the bogons ACL at the beginning. > > acl bogons { > ! 192.168.16.0/21; > 0.0.0.0/8; > [...] > 192.168.0.0/16; > [...] > }; > > Chris Buxton > Professional

Re: Views and Blackhole

2008-11-18 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 09:38:13PM -0600, root net wrote: > I have a server I am testing before I put in production. Working on a more > secure bind config. BTW if anyone has any other suggestions on locking down > bind beside below and chroot let me know. Use TSIG for master-slave communication,

Re: ISC launches new website and mailing list manager

2008-11-18 Thread Lars Hecking
> The mailing list conversion requires a little explanation: > > * The new one-stop page for all the lists under isc.org is > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo Now, can it be configured to strip or reject html rubbish? ___ bind-users mailing

RE: Slave Servers Return SERVFAIL

2008-11-18 Thread Davenport, Steve M
Hello, I am having issues with reverse lookups failing and can not find the cause. Running bind 9.3.5-P1 and 9.3.6rc1. On an external server dig gives: $ dig @harley.mc.utmck.edu -x 165.6.6.27 ; <<>> DiG 9.5.0-P1 <<>> @harley.mc.utmck.edu -x 165.6.6.27 ; (1 server found) ;; global options: pr

RE: BIND 9.5.0-P2 DNS issue

2008-11-18 Thread Daniel Dawalibi
Hello The value of max-cache-size is unlimited. We installed another version of bind on different servers, but we are still facing the same issue. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thomas Schulz Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 10:39 PM To:

Reverse lookups failing

2008-11-18 Thread Davenport, Steve M
Hello, I am having issues with reverse lookups failing and can not find the cause. Running bind 9.3.5-P1 and 9.3.6rc1. On an external server dig gives: $ dig @harley.mc.utmck.edu -x 165.6.6.27 ; <<>> DiG 9.5.0-P1 <<>> @harley.mc.utmck.edu -x 165.6.6.27 ; (1 server found) ;; global options: pr

Re: 9.5.0 P2 gives diff ip for worldnet.att.net than swBell DNS?

2008-11-18 Thread Kevin Darcy
Les Caudle wrote: On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 10:26:11 +1100, Mark Andrews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Les Caudle writes: I noticed that I could not access this web page from within my network: http://worldnet.att.net/general-info/bls_info/block_inquiry.html I

Re: Slave Servers Return SERVFAIL

2008-11-18 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 08:25:13PM -0800, Merton Campbell Crockett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 51 lines which said: > My colleagues decided to do away with the delegations and separate > zone files and placed all the PTR records in a single zone file. This is mostly a matter of tast

Re: Secondary and TLD not updating

2008-11-18 Thread Dawn Connelly
Hey, maybe it's time to agree to disagree on this one? If Bert and Ernie can live together in roommate bliss, I'm sure we can all accept and appreciate each others differences. On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 7:47 PM, Kevin Darcy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Just because ind

Re: Views and Blackhole

2008-11-18 Thread Chris Buxton
Remove your subnet from the bogons ACL at the beginning. acl bogons { ! 192.168.16.0/21; 0.0.0.0/8; [...] 192.168.0.0/16; [...] }; Chris Buxton Professional Services Men & Mice On Nov 17, 2008, at 8:38 PM, root net wrote: Hello, I have a server I am te