Re: [Beowulf] Re: SGI to offer Windos on clusters ---> Skew/Jitter paper

2007-01-22 Thread Peter Kjellstrom
On Monday 22 January 2007 16:39, Ashley Pittman wrote: ... > In answer to a previous post about using extra CPUS/cores to alleviate > this problem it's not a new idea, IIRC PSC were doing this six or seven > years ago, I was well aware that it wasn't new at all, my main point was that given the "

RE: [Beowulf] Re: SGI to offer Windos on clusters ---> Skew/Jitter paper

2007-01-22 Thread Ashley Pittman
On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 23:12 -0500, Mark Hahn wrote: > >>"The Case of the Missing Supercomputing Performance" > > > > I wondered if you were talking about that paper but it's from lanl not > > sandia, it should be essential reading for everyone working with large > > clusters. > > I love this

RE: [Beowulf] Re: SGI to offer Windos on clusters ---> Skew/Jitter paper

2007-01-19 Thread Mark Hahn
"The Case of the Missing Supercomputing Performance" I wondered if you were talking about that paper but it's from lanl not sandia, it should be essential reading for everyone working with large clusters. I love this paper. but it's critical to realize that it's all about very large, very

RE: [Beowulf] Re: SGI to offer Windos on clusters ---> Skew/Jitter paper

2007-01-18 Thread ashley
> And got it. The title is: > >"The Case of the Missing Supercomputing Performance" I wondered if you were talking about that paper but it's from lanl not sandia, it should be essential reading for everyone working with large clusters. Ashley, __