At my employer, we use a variety of monitoring tools for our various
clusters. Our nagios box is a VM with a single processor and 512MB of
memory. Currently, we monitor 1700 hosts, each with three or four
service checks a piece (two of which SSH to nodes to run scripts). We
check services about eve
We have quite a few different PBS servers running PBSPro 9.x. Our
Nagios box has a bare install of the PBSPro and we wrote a check
script that runs "pbsnodes -s $cluster-head-node $nodehostname" and
checks to see if PBS thinks the node is happy. (We determine which PBS
server to hit up based on the
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 10:23 PM, Alex Younts wrote:
> At my employer, we use a variety of monitoring tools for our various
> clusters. Our nagios box is a VM with a single processor and 512MB of
> memory. Currently, we monitor 1700 hosts, each with three or four
> service checks a piece (two of w
2008/12/23 Rahul Nabar
>
> I'd like (2) because it is more secure and seems easier to deploy but
> I'm a bit afraid if this will overtax my central server.
>
> Any suggestions? Are other users using Nagios here?
>
Rahul, I'm not a Nagios expert, but I have used NRPE for monitoring quite
some time
I just installed Nagios to try and monitor my 256 compute nodes
centrally. It seems to work like a charm for all the public services
(ping, ssh etc.) but now I was getting more ambitious and wanted to
try to monitor the private services too (disk usage; process loads;
torque ; pbs etc.).
I was jus
