-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/03/13 14:22, Mark Hahn wrote:
> hey! I said IMO, so technically you can't disagree! :)
Grin, and technically having read the rest of that email (yes, I'm
really lagged at the moment) I have to agree.
cheers!
Chris
- --
Christopher Samuel
On Mar 12, 2013, at 5:45 AM, Mark Hahn wrote:
>>> I don't think it is a useful distinction: both are basiclly
>>> independent
>>> computers. obviously, the programming model of Phi is dramatically
>>> more
>>> like a conventional processor than Nvidia.
>>>
>>
>> Mark, that's the marketing talk a
hi Amjad,
I would like to point to 1 really important practical difference.
co-processors can have magnificent latency from the co-processor to
the cpu. In the nano-seconds.
Accelerators i'd argue typically go via pci-e or similar, so have
horrible latency, in the microseconds or slower.
Acc
owulf-boun...@beowulf.org [mailto:beowulf-boun...@beowulf.org] On
Behalf Of Brendan Moloney
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 9:02 PM
To: Joshua mora acosta
Cc: Beowulf List; Mark Hahn
Subject: Re: [Beowulf] difference between accelerators and co-processors
I think this analysis is missing some important
0, 2013 9:36 AM
To: Beowulf Mailing List
Subject: [Beowulf] difference between accelerators and co-processors
Hello All,
Is there any line/point to make distinction between accelerators and
co-processors (that are used in conjunction with the primary CPU to boost up
the performance)? or these terms
>> 1) Comparing a single low power APU to a single high power discrete GPU
>> doesn't make sense for HPC. Rather we should compare a rack of equipment
>> that can operate in the same power envelope.
> [Joshua] I was comparing, or the paper compares a system (APU) vs a system
> (CPU+GPU).
and I wa
Good comments.
My comments inline.
Joshua
-- Original Message --
Received: 11:02 PM CDT, 03/11/2013
From: Brendan Moloney
To: Joshua mora acosta Cc: Vincent Diepeveen
, Mark Hahn , Beowulf List
Subject: Re: [Beowulf] difference between accelerators and co-processors
> I think t
>> I don't think it is a useful distinction: both are basiclly
>> independent
>> computers. obviously, the programming model of Phi is dramatically
>> more
>> like a conventional processor than Nvidia.
>>
>
> Mark, that's the marketing talk about Xeon Phi.
I have no idea what this means. Nvidia'
>
> -- Original Message --
> Received: 04:06 PM CDT, 03/10/2013
> From: Vincent Diepeveen
> To: Mark Hahn Cc: Beowulf List
> Subject: Re: [Beowulf] difference between accelerators and co-processors
>
> >
> > On Mar 10, 2013, at 9:03 PM, Mark Hahn wrote:
>
>> IMO, a coprocessor executes the same instruction stream as the
>> "primary" processor.
>
> I'm not so sure about that, the first thing I came across described as
hey! I said IMO, so technically you can't disagree! :)
> a coprocessor was the "Tube" for the BBC Micro in the mid 1980's. It
> w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/03/13 07:03, Mark Hahn wrote:
> IMO, a coprocessor executes the same instruction stream as the
> "primary" processor.
I'm not so sure about that, the first thing I came across described as
a coprocessor was the "Tube" for the BBC Micro in the
Mark Hahn Cc: Beowulf List
Subject: Re: [Beowulf] difference between accelerators and co-processors
>
> On Mar 10, 2013, at 9:03 PM, Mark Hahn wrote:
>
> >> Is there any line/point to make distinction between accelerators and
> >> co-processors (that are used in
On Mar 10, 2013, at 9:03 PM, Mark Hahn wrote:
>> Is there any line/point to make distinction between accelerators and
>> co-processors (that are used in conjunction with the primary CPU
>> to boost
>> up the performance)? or these terms can be used interchangeably?
>
> IMO, a coprocessor execut
> Is there any line/point to make distinction between accelerators and
> co-processors (that are used in conjunction with the primary CPU to boost
> up the performance)? or these terms can be used interchangeably?
IMO, a coprocessor executes the same instruction stream as the
"primary" processor.
Hello All,
Is there any line/point to make distinction between accelerators and
co-processors (that are used in conjunction with the primary CPU to boost
up the performance)? or these terms can be used interchangeably?
Specifically, the word "accelerator" is used commonly with GPU. On the
other h
15 matches
Mail list logo